期刊文献+

中国国内增加值贸易隐含劳动力分析——基于能源视角的列昂惕夫悖论再检验 被引量:1

Analysis of Labor Embodied in Interregional Value-added Trade:Re-examination of Leontief Paradox from the Perspective of Energy Use
原文传递
导出
摘要 在增加值贸易的框架下,作者运用多区域投入产出模型分析中国区域间贸易隐含就业的情况,通过衡量八个区域生产隐含的能源-劳动力强度,考察实证结果与理论预测的一致性。研究发现,东部沿海和中部地区是中国区域间贸易的主要参与者;工资水平较高的东部沿海是最大的隐含劳动力净输出地,而工资水平较低的西北地区、北部沿海和西南地区是隐含劳动力的净输入地。这说明,中国区域间贸易具有列昂惕夫悖论的基本特征。作者基于能源-劳动力强度视角,进一步分析增加值贸易与劳动就业在机器大生产环境下的关系,发现人均GRP较低的西北地区的能源-劳动力强度最高,而人均GRP较高的京津地区和南部沿海的能源-劳动力强度最低,且经济发达区域仍然是劳动力的净输出地。通过对各区域比较优势行业的进一步分析发现,西北地区和北部沿海高度依赖基础性初级产品行业的单一产业结构是实证结果与传统理论不一致的主要原因,完善基础设施和产业结构是这些地区转变粗放型增长方式和实现结构升级的重要一环。 Based on the multi-regional input-output framework,this paper analyzes the labor embodied in interregional trade in China.Meanwhile,through estimating the energy intensity per unit of labor embodied in final products in each region,this study examines whether the empirical results are consistent with the theoretical hypothesis.Results show that East Coast and Central Region are the two main participants in interregional trade.As for the labor embodied in trade,East Coast is the largest exporter of embodied labor,though it has the highest wage among eight regions;in contrast,Northwest,North Coast and Southwest,with relatively low wage,are the three largest importer of embodied labor.This reveals that the basic characteristics of“Leontief Paradox”exist in China's interregional trade.This paper further analyzes the relationship between trade in value-added and employment from the perspective of energy intensity per unit of labor.Results show that the energy intensity per unit of labor in region with relatively low GRP(such as Northwest)is the highest,whereas those in Jingjin Region and South Coast(with relatively high GRP)are the lowest.By analyzing the Revealed Comparative Advantage in each region,the paper finds that the main reason for this inconsistency lies in the industrial structure in Northwest and North Coast,which are highly dependent in primary industries.Improving the infrastructure and upgrading industrial structure are important steps for these regions to transform the extensive growth mode.
作者 闫冰倩 王振霞 YAN Bing-qian;WANG Zhen-xia(National Academy of Economic Strategy,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100028,China)
出处 《城市与环境研究》 CSSCI 2020年第4期60-76,共17页 Urban and Environmental Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目“全球价值链视角下我国区域真实能源利用率与减排路径研究”(批准号:71903195) 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院青年科研基金项目“我国区域真实能源生产率”(批准号:2019CJY05003) 人社部留学人员科技活动择优资助项目(2015年)。
关键词 贸易隐含要素 劳动力 能源 多区域投入产出模型 列昂惕夫悖论 factors embodied in trade labor energy multi-regional input-output model Leontief Paradox
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献117

  • 1张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5642
  • 2樊纲,关志雄,姚枝仲,晓鸥(校对).国际贸易结构分析:贸易品的技术分布[J].经济研究,2006,41(8):70-80. 被引量:441
  • 3杜修立,王维国.中国出口贸易的技术结构及其变迁:1980—2003[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):137-151. 被引量:313
  • 4刘卫东.中国2007年30省区市区域间投入产出表编制理论与实践[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2012.
  • 5Anderson, J. E. , and E. van Wincoop, 2003, "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, VoI. 93:170-192.
  • 6Baldwin, Richard, and Javier Lopez-Gonzalez, 2013, " Supply-Chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses", NBER Working Paper No. 18957.
  • 7Bernhofen, D. M. ,and John C. Brown, 2001, "A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan", Clark University, August, manuscript.
  • 8Bernhofen, D. M. , 2009, "Multiple Cones, Factor Price Differences and the Factor Content of Trade", Journal of International Economics, 79: 266-271.
  • 9Brecher, Richard E. , and E. V. Choudhri, 1982, "The Factor Content of International Trade without Factor Price Equalization", Journal of International Economics, Vol. 12 : 277-278.
  • 10Chaney, T. , 2008, " Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade", American Economic Review, Vol. 98(4): 1707-1721.

共引文献300

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部