期刊文献+

阿法替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的快速卫生技术评估 被引量:5

Afatinib for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer:a rapid health technology assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价阿法替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的有效性、安全性和经济性,为临床治疗以及国家基本药物目录的准入提供循证依据。方法:通过计算机检索PubMed、Embase、the Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方等中英文数据库。由2位评价者根据纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料,并进行定性分析和快速卫生技术评估。结果:从946篇文献中筛选纳入2篇卫生技术评估(HTA)报告、10篇SR/Meta分析和5篇经济学研究。与吉非替尼、厄洛替尼以及标准化疗相比,阿法替尼可以显著延长晚期NSCLC患者的无进展生存期(PFS,HR=0.57,95%CI:0.42~0.76;P<0.0001),但在总生存期(OS)方面未见明显改善(HR=0.91,95%CI:0.83~0.99;P=0.562)。对于经铂化疗失败后晚期鳞状NSCLC患者,阿法替尼较厄洛替尼能显著延长PFS(HR=0.82,95%CI:0.68~1.00;P=0.0427)和OS(HR=0.81,95%CI:0.69~0.95;P=0.0077)。安全性方面,与对照组相比,阿法替尼治疗后腹泻、皮疹和口腔炎的发生率明显升高(P值均<0.05),但因药物不良事件而停止治疗和致死性不良事件(FAEs)的发生率没有显著性差异。结论:阿法替尼治疗晚期NSCLC具有良好的有效性和安全性。 Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness,safety and economy of afatinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients,and provide evidence for clinical treatment and the National Essential Drug List access.Methods:English and Chinese databases such as PubMed,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,and Wanfang were searched.Two reviewers independently identified literatures,extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results:We screened 946 literatures and finally included 2 HTA reports,10 systematic review/meta-analysis and 5 pharmacoeconomic studies.Compared with gefitinib,erlotinib or the standard chemotherapy,afatinib significantly prolonged PFS(HR=0.57,95%CI:0.42~0.76;P<0.0001)of advanced NSCLC patients,but there was no significant difference in OS(HR=0.91,95%CI:0.83~0.99;P=0.562).There were significant improvements in PFS(HR=0.82,95%CI:0.68~1.00;P=0.0427)and OS(HR=0.81,95%CI:0.69~0.95;P=0.0077)for afatinib compared with erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.In terms of safety,afatinib significantly increased the incidence of diarrhea,rash and stomatitis,compared with the control group(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in FAEs and discontinuation of treatment due to AEs.Conclusion:Afatinib is an efficacious and safe choice in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.
作者 赵冰清 白羽 张艳华 翟所迪 ZHAO Bing-qing;BAI Yu;ZHANG Yan-hua;ZHAI Suo-di(Department of Pharmacy,Third Hospitai of Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Key Laboratory of Cancer Pathogenesis and Transformation,Department of Pharmacy,Beijing Institute of Cancer Control and Prevention,Peking University Cancer Hospital,Beijing 100142,China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第24期2868-2873,共6页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词 阿法替尼 非小细胞肺癌 快速卫生技术评估 afatinib non-small cell lung cancer rapid health technology assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1王金万,孙燕,刘永煜,于起涛,张沂平,李凯,朱允中,周清华,侯梅,管忠震,李维廉,庄武,王东林,梁后杰,秦凤展,卢辉山,刘晓晴,孙红,张燕军,王杰军,罗素霞,杨瑞合,涂远荣,王秀问,宋恕平,周静敏,游丽芬,王竞,姚晨.重组人血管内皮抑素联合NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC随机、双盲、对照、多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):283-290. 被引量:626
  • 2Tricco A C,Antony J,Zarin W,et al.A scoping review of rapid review methods[J].BMC Med,2015,13(1):224.
  • 3Polisena J,Garritty C,Kamel C,et al.Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making:a descriptive analysis of processes and methods[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):26.
  • 4Ganann R,Ciliska D,Thomas H.Expediting systematic reviews:methods and implications of rapid reviews[J].Implement Sci,2010(5):56.
  • 5Khangura S,Konnyu K,Cushman R,et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev,2012(1):10.
  • 6Harker J,Kleijnen J.What is a rapid review?A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].Int J Evid Based Healthc,2012,10(4):397-410.
  • 7Featherstone R M,Dryden D M,Foisy M,et al.Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews:an analysis of results,conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):50.
  • 8Hailey D.Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
  • 9Brouwers M,Kho M E,Browman G P,et al.AGREE II:Advancing guideline development,reporting and evaluation in healthcare[J].J Clin Epidemol,2010,63(12):1308-1311.
  • 10Higgins J P T,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][J/OL].(2011-03-10)[2015-07-21].http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.

共引文献3573

同被引文献138

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部