期刊文献+

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果分析 被引量:7

Analysis of the clinical effect of laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术(LCS)治疗结直肠癌的临床效果。方法选取2018年8月至2019年5月山西省肿瘤医院结直肠肛门外科收治的64例结直肠癌患者,男37例,女27例,年龄(52.71±2.68)岁,年龄范围为33~72岁,对其一般资料进行回顾性分析。根据是否采用LCS将患者分为腹腔镜组(n=30)及传统开腹组(n=34),比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清除数、术后住院时间、术后胃肠功能恢复时间及术后并发症(术后吻合口瘘、肠梗阻、肺部感染、切口感染)发生率。结果腹腔镜组患者手术时间[(137.21±19.11)min]、术中出血量[(141.25±8.33)ml]、术后住院时间[(5.84±1.72)d]、术后胃肠功能恢复时间[(2.31±0.69)d]均优于传统开腹组[(178.57±15.38)min、(197.55±10.41)ml、(8.46±2.37)d、(3.89±0.93)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者淋巴结清除数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组患者并发症发生率[9.9%(3/30)]低于传统开腹组[26.4%(9/34)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 LCS治疗效果显著,可有效降低并发症的发生率,具有较高的安全性和有效性。 Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery.Methods:From August 2018 to May 2019, a total of 64 colorectal cancer patients, 37 males and 27 females, aged(52.71±2.68)years old, ranging from 33 to 72 years old, were admitted to the Colorectal and Anorectal Surgery department of Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital and their general data were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into the laparoscopic group( n=30)and the traditional laparotomy group( n=34)according to whether laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery was performed.The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node clearance, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative complications(postoperative anastomotic leakage, intestinal root resistance, pulmonary infection, incision infection)and incidence rate were compared between the two groups. Results:The operation time[(137.21±19.11)minutes], intraoperative blood loss[(141.25±8.33)ml], postoperative hospital stay[(5.84±1.72)days], postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time[(2.31±0.69)days] in the laparoscopic group were better than those in the traditional laparotomy group[(178.57±15.38)minutes, (197.55±10.41)ml, (8.46±2.37)days, (3.89±0.93)days], and the differences were statistically significant( P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in lymph node clearance and complications between the two groups( P>0.05). The incidence of complications in the laparoscopic group[9.9%(3/30)] was lower than that in the traditional laparotomy group[26.4%(9/34)], the differences were statistically significant( P<0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer not only has a significant therapeutic effect, but also can effectively reduce the incidence of complications, and has high safety and effectiveness.
作者 王立春 王文达 刘世洲 Warng lichun;Wang Wenda;Li Shizhou(Department of Colorectal Anorectal Surgery,Shanxi Prowincial Cancer Hospital,Taiyuan 030000,China;Depariment of Emergency,Shanxi Bethune Hospital,Taiyuan 030000,Chirna)
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2020年第6期27-30,共4页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
基金 山西省自然科学基金面上项目(2015011131)。
关键词 结直肠癌 腹腔镜 传统开腹结直肠癌根治术 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术 Colorectal cancer laparoscopic Open colorectal of resertion cancer Laparoscopiccolorectal cancer radical surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献103

  • 1池畔,林惠铭,徐宗斌.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌根治术围手术期并发症发生率比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(3):221-224. 被引量:85
  • 2曹其彬,胡三元.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术对机体免疫功能的比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(8):615-618. 被引量:53
  • 3腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:271
  • 4Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al. Cancer statistics,2010[ J]. Cancer J Clin ,2010,60:277 - 300.
  • 5Jacobs M, Verdeja JC,Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon re- section ( la - paroscopic colectomy) [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991,1 (3) :144 - 150.
  • 6Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesoeolie excision and central liga-tion-techni- eal notes and outcome[J]. Colorectal Dis,2009,11 (4):354-364.
  • 7Higgins JPT, Green S. Chapter 8 : Assessing risk of bias in included studies[ M ]//Coehrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Inter- ventions Version 5.1.0 [ updated March 2011 ]. The Cochrane Col- laboration ,2011.
  • 8Liang X, Hou S, Liu H,et al. Effectiveness and safety of laparoscop- ie resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer:a ran- domized controlled trial from China[ J ]. J Laparoendose Adv Surg Teeh A,2011,21(5):381 -385.
  • 9Schflin J, Buunen M, Hop W, et al. Bowel obstruction after laparo- scopie and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of fol- low-up in a randomized trial[ J]. Surg Endosc,2011,25(12) :3755 - 3760.
  • 10Stucky CC,Pockaj BA,Novotny PJ, et al. Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to lapa- roscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93 - 46 - 53 ( INT 0146)[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2011,18(9) :2422 -2431.

共引文献294

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部