期刊文献+

诊断模型联合分娩镇痛预防剖宫产术后经阴道分娩疼痛的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Groman model along with labor analgesia on pain relief during vaginal birth after cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究Grobman模型联合分娩镇痛对剖宫产术后经阴道分娩预防分娩疼痛及母婴结局影响。方法收集2016年10月至2018年9月南通市妇幼保健院收治的瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩产妇180例。根据随机数字法,分为观察组(90例)和对照组(90例),观察组运用Grobman模型评估,对阈值>70%的瘢痕子宫阴道分娩产妇,给予椎管内镇痛,阈值≤70%者于宫口扩张>3 cm时给予椎管内镇痛,对照组为自然临产。统计分析两组产妇第一与第二产程时长、出血量、先兆子宫破裂发生率、疼痛感评分、平均住院时间和新生儿窒息率、新生儿Apgar评分。结果观察组产妇的VAS评分(1.43±0.52)分、住院时间(5.13±0.25)d,低于对照组的(6.39±1.82)分、(7.62±0.48)d,差异有统计学意义(t=24.860、43.678,P<0.05);观察组的阴道分娩率94.44%,高于对照组的81.11%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=7.457,P<0.05)。观察组的剖宫产率5.56%,低于对照组的18.89%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=9.015,P<0.05);观察组的总满意率97.78%,高于对照组的87.78%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.716,P<0.05)。结论 Grobman模型联合分娩镇痛应用于剖宫产术后经阴道分娩,能有效减轻疼痛感,不延长产程,对新生儿无不良影响,安全有效。 Objective To explore the effects of Groman model along with labor analgesia on pain relief as well as on maternal and neonatal outcomes during vaginal birth after cesarean section. Methods A total of 180 multipara undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean section in Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from October 2016 to September 2018 were enrolled and evenly divided into observation group(n=90) and control group(n=90) using random number table method.Subjects in the observation group was evaluated by Groman model and those with a pain threshold greater than 70% were given intrathecal analgesia, while subjects in the control group underwnt natural childbirth.The length of the first and second stage of labor, postpartum bleeding, incidence of uterine rupture, pain score, length of hospital stay, neonatal asphyxia rate and neonatal Apgar score were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, the visual analogue score(VAS) was remarkably lower than that in the control group(1.43±0.52 vs 6.39±1.82, t=24.860, P<0.05) and the length of hospital stay was much shorter(5.13±0.25 d vs 7.62±0.48 d, t=43.678, P<0.05).The rate of vaginal childbirth and the overall satisfaction rate were both significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group(94.44% vs 81.11%, 97.78% vs 87.78%, χ^(2)=7.457,6.716,P<0.05), while the rate of cesarean section was significantly lower(5.56% vs 18.89%,χ^(2)=9.015,P<0.05). Conclusions Groman model along with labor analgesia can effectively reduce labor pain during vaginal birth after cesarean section without extending labor duration and is safe for both multipara and newborns.
作者 陈志芳 孙晓琴 刘华华 吴迎春 成晓燕 CHEN Zhi-fang;SUN Xiao-qin;LIU Hua-hua;WU Ying-chun;CHENG Xiao-yan(Department of Obstetrics,Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Nantong,Jiangsu 226018,China)
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2020年第12期1316-1320,共5页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
基金 南通市科技计划基金资助项目(GJZ16113)。
关键词 Grobman模型 剖宫产术后阴道分娩 分娩镇痛 阴道分娩 疼痛评分 Grobman model Vaginal delivery after cesarean section Labor analgesia Vaginal delivery Pain score
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1刘雁峰,贾淑英,佟锦香.腰-硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中的应用效果及对产程的影响[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(6):714-716. 被引量:31
  • 2冯丹,姚尚龙,张小铭.硬膜外分娩镇痛对产妇子宫收缩的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(12):893-895. 被引量:39
  • 3Troyer LR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system [ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 167(4 Pt 1) : 1099 -1104.
  • 4Weinstein D, Benshushan A, TanosV, et al. Predictive sco hr vaginal birth after cesarean section [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 174(1 Pt 1) : 192 - 198.
  • 5Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birtl after cesarean delive: an admission scoring system [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 90 (6) : 907 -910.
  • 6Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, et al. Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed va- ginal birth after cesarean section score [ J]. Am J Perinatol, 2004, 21 (8) : 447 -453.
  • 7Smith GCS, White IR, Pell JP,et al. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vagina[ birth 'after prior cesarean section [J]. PLoS Med, 2005, 2(9) : e252.
  • 8Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a homo- gram for predietion of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109(4) : 806 -812.
  • 9Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, et al. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(3) : 571 -578.
  • 10Jakobi P, Weissman A, Peretz BA, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors for vaginal delivery after cesarean section[J ]. J Reprod Med, 1993, 38(9) : 729 -733.

同被引文献63

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部