期刊文献+

科技型新创企业社会资本、资源拼凑与成长绩效的关系研究 被引量:5

Social capital,Bricolage and Growth Performance of Technology New Ventures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有研究显示社会资本对企业成长既有正面的促进作用,又会产生锁定等负面作用。基于社会建构理论,资源拼凑将通过重新定义和组合现有资源,降低社会资本锁定的负面效应。通过215家新创企业的调查样本验证了研究假设。结果表明,外部社会资本和内部社会资本均与新创企业资源拼凑行为正向相关,企业资源拼凑行为能促进企业的成长绩效,而资源拼凑在外部、内部社会资本与成长绩效间关系中起着中介作用。上述研究成果为理解我国新创企业的成长提供了新的理论贡献和实践启示。 Studies show that social capital has a positive effect on the growth of enterprises, and it will have a negative effect such as locking. Based on the theory of social construction, this research proposes that bricolage can reduce the negative effects of social capital by redefining and combining existing resources. The research hypothesis was validated through a survey of 215 start-ups. The results show that both external social capital and internal social capital are positively related to the bricolage behavior of new ventures;Bricolage can promote the growth performance;Furthermore, bricolage plays a mediating role in the relationship between external/internal social capital and growth performance. The above research results provide a new theoretical contribution and practical enlightenment for understanding the growth of China’s new ventures.
作者 黄艳 朱福林 陈欢 晋祎璠 HUANG Yan;ZHU Fulin;CHEN Huan;JIN Yifan(School of Management,Beijing Union University,Beijing 100101;Institute of International Trade and Economic Cooperation,Ministry of Commerce,Beijing 100710)
出处 《科技促进发展》 CSCD 2020年第12期1535-1541,共7页 Science & Technology for Development
基金 2019年教育部产学合作协同育人项目(201902063007):基于创新方法的创新创业教育体系构建与实践,负责人:黄艳 2020年北京联合大学人才强校优选计划项目(BPHR2020CS06):社会资本、资源拼凑与新创企业成长绩效研究,负责人:黄艳 2020年北京市社会科学基金北京学研究基地科研项目(BJXJD-KT2020-YB12):世界文化中心城市的国际比较研究,负责人:黄艳。
关键词 社会资本 资源拼凑 成长绩效 social capital bricolage growth performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献74

  • 1HE Z L, WONG P K. Exploration vs. Exploitation. An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis [J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4) :481~494.
  • 2O'REILLY III C A, TUSHMAN M L. Organiza- tional Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4) : 324~338.
  • 3MARCH J G. Exploration and Exploitation in Or- ganizational Learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71~87.
  • 4JANSENJJ P, VAN DEN BOSCH F A J, VOLB- ERDA H W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organiza tional Antecedents and Environmental Moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1 661~ 1 674.
  • 5TUSHMAN M L, O' REILLY III C A. Ambidex- trous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change [J]. California Management Review, 1996, 38(4): 8~30.
  • 6BORGH M, SCHEPERS J J L. Do Retailers Really Profit from Ambidextrous Managers? The Impact of Frontline Mechanisms on New and Existing Product Selling Performance[J]. Journal of Product Innova- tion Management, 2014, 31 (4): 710 ~ 727.
  • 7BAKER T, NELSON R E. Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepre- neurial Bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarter- 1y,2005,50(3) : 329~366.
  • 8SALUNKE S, WEERAWARDENA J, MCCOLL- KENNEDY J R. Competing through Service Innova- tion: The Role of Bricolage and Entrepreneurship in Project-Oriented Firms[J]. Journal of Business Re- search, 2013, 66(8): 1 085~1 097.
  • 9GARUDR, KARNOE P. Bricolage vs. Break- through: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(2): 277~300.
  • 10BAKER T,POLLOCK T G, SAPIENZA H J. Win- ning an Unfair Game: How a Resource -Constrained Player Uses Bricolage to Maneuver for Advantage in a Highly Institutionalized Field[J]. Advances in En- trepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 2013, 15(1) :1-41.

共引文献154

同被引文献81

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部