混合担保追偿的请求权基础——以民法典第700条为考察中心

Basis for the Claim of the Right of Recourse for the Mixed Guarantee:Taking the Article 700 of the Civil Code as the Angle of View

由于法律的摇摆,我国混合担保人之间是否存在追偿权一直以来存在争议,实务界的判决亦不尽相同。在理论界,学者试图通过连带责任、不当得利和公平原则来证立追偿权的请求权基础,均不能够自圆其说。代位权制度则较为合理的为混合担保提供了追偿权的请求权基础,这一制度亦被《民法典》第700条肯定,从而为我国混合担保追偿权存在与否这一争议问题画上了句号。

Due to the swing of the law,there has always been a dispute over whether there is a right of recourse among the mixed guarantors in China,and the judgments in the practical circles are also different.In the theoretical circle,scholars try to prove the basis of the right of claim through the principles of joint and several liability,unjust enrichment and fairness,which cannot be justified.The subrogation system is more reasonable and provides the basis for the claim of the right of recourse for the mixed guarantee.This system has also been affirmed by the article 700 of the Civil Code,thus providing the existence of the right of recourse for the mixed guarantee in China.