期刊文献+

婴幼儿配方食品中维生素D标准检验方法等效性评价研究 被引量:5

Equivalence evaluation of standard testing methods for vitamin D in infant formula food
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价研究婴幼儿配方食品中维生素D标准检验方法等效性。方法采用成对方法比较,通过实验室间比对研究,结合方法性能评价与运用合适统计工具对标准检验方法的分析结果进行定性定量评价。结果综合对方法性能与检测结果的评价,成对方法之间无显著性差异,在等效边界15%时方法等效,检测均值的差异均低于可接受临界差异。结论3对成对方法是等效的。方法等效性评价接受标准必须结合企业内部质量控制或监管层面实际的需求而定。 Objective To evaluate the equivalence of standard testing methods for vitamin D in infant formula food.Methods Pairwise method comparison from inter-laboratory testing was applied.The study was combined by method performance evaluation and analytical results evaluation using qualitative and quantitative statistical tools.Results Comprehensive evaluation of method performance and analytical results,there was no significant difference between the paired methods,the method was equivalent when the equivalent bound was 15%,and the difference of the testing mean was lower than the acceptable critical difference.Conclusion The 3 pairwise methods are equivalent.The acceptance criteria for method equivalence evaluation must be combined with the actual needs of the industry’s quality control or regulatory supervision.
作者 朱炜 吕宁 袁华强 孟慧琴 漆琳 苏丽娜 宋才湖 杨晶华 梁成珠 ZHU Wei;LV Ning;YUAN Hua-Qiang;MENG Hui-Qin;QI Lin;SU Li-Na;SONG Cai-Hu;YANG Jing-Hua;LIANG Cheng-Zhu(Danone Open Science Research Center,Shanghai 201204,China;Qingdao Custom Technical Center,Qingdao 266001,China)
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第4期1566-1573,共8页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
关键词 维生素D 方法等效性 实验室间比对 统计学 婴幼儿配方食品 vitamin D method equivalence inter-lab comparison statistics infant formula food
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Benet LZ.Understanding bioequivalence testing[J].Transplantation proceedings,1999,31(3) Supp 1:7S-9S
  • 2Patterson S,Jones B.Bioeqnivalence and statistics in clinical pharmacology[M].Boca Raton:Chapman and Hall/CRC,2006
  • 3Wellek S.Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence[M].Boca Raton:Chapman and Hall/CRC,2003
  • 4Jones B,Kenward MG.Design and analysis of cross over trials 2nd ed[M].Boca Raton:Chapman and Hall/CRC,2003
  • 5Stephen Senn.Cross over trials in Clinical research 2nd ed[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,2002
  • 6Chow Shein-Chong,Lin Jen-Pei.Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies 2nd ed[M].Boca Raton:Chapman and HalI/CRC,2000
  • 7Sheiner LB,Steimer JL.Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development[J].Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology,2000,40:67-95
  • 8Barrett JS,Batra V,Chow A,et al.Update to the PhRMA perspective on population and individual bioequivalence[J].Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,2000,40(6):571-572
  • 9Taber DJ,Baillie GM,Ashcraft EE,et al.Does bioequivalence between modified cyclosporine formulations translate into equal outcomes[J]? Transplantation,2005,80(11):1633-1635
  • 10Trottet L,Owen H,Holme P,et al.Are all aciclovir cream formulations bioequivalent[J]International Journal of Pharmaceutics,2005,304(1):63-71

共引文献1

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部