期刊文献+

垂体后叶素联合小剂量糖皮质激素治疗儿童感染性休克临床疗效及对患儿血清炎性标志物水平的影响 被引量:1

Clinical efficacy of hypophysin combined with low-dose glucocorticoids in the treatment of septic shock and its effect on serum infection markers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨垂体后叶素联合小剂量糖皮质激素治疗儿童感染性休克临床疗效及对患儿血清炎性标志物水平的影响.方法将90例感染性休克患儿按照随机数字表法分为治疗组与对照组,每组45例.两组均给予常规治疗及垂体后叶素治疗,治疗组在此基础上联合小剂量氢化可的松静脉滴注.比较两组患儿重症加强护理病房住院时间、垂体后叶素使用时间,比较治疗前后两组乳酸水平、降钙素原、C反应蛋白、前白蛋白水平及急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分,比较两组不良反应发生率.结果治疗组重症加强护理病房住院时间及垂体后叶素使用时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.01).治疗后两组乳酸水平及急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01),治疗组较对照组下降更显著(P<0.01).治疗后两组降钙素原及C反应蛋白水平均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.01),前白蛋白水平较治疗前显著升高(P<0.01),治疗组较对照组变化更显著(P<0.01).治疗组不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05).结论小剂量糖皮质激素联合垂体后叶素治疗感染性休克患儿疗效显著,能够缩短重症加强护理病房住院时间,降低乳酸及血清炎性标志物水平,安全性高. Objective To explore the efficacy of hypophysin combined with low-dose glucocorticoids in the treatment of septic shock and its effect on serum infection markers.Methods 90 cases of children patients with septic shock were divided into treatment group and control group,45 cases each.Both groups were given conventional treatment and treatment with hypophysin.The treatment group was combined with a small dose of hydrocortisone intravenous infusion on this basis.The hospitalization time and the use time of vasopressin in the intensive care unit were compared between the two groups.The lactic acid levels,procalcitonin,Creactive protein,prealbumin levels,acute physiological functions and chronic health status scoring system II scores were compared between the two groups.The incidence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups.Results The duration of ICU stay and the use time of hypophysin in the treatment group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.01).The lactic acid level and APAC HE II scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.01),and the treatment group decreased more significantly than the control group(P<0.01).After treatment,the PCT and CRP levels in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.01),and the PA level was significantly higher than before treatment(P<0.01).The treat-ment group was more significant than the control group(P<0.01).The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions Low-dose glucocorticoid combined with hypophysin is effective in the treatment of children with septic shock.It can shorten the leng th of hospitalization in intensive care units,reduce the levels of lactic acid and serum infection markers,and has high safety.
作者 张伟东 王幸丽 杨红 张义堂 Zhang Weidong;Wang Xingli;Yang Hong;Zhang Yitang(The Central Hospital of Nanyang City,Nanyang 473000,Henan,China)
机构地区 南阳市中心医院
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2020年第1期17-19,133,共4页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 感染性休克 糖皮质激素 垂体后叶素 重症加强护理病房 急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ Septic shock glucocorticoid hypophysin intensive care unit APACHEⅡ
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献90

  • 1支成斌,匡中国,韦毅.垂体后叶素治疗咯血引起低钠血症97例诊治分析[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(22):6027-6028. 被引量:7
  • 2孙成栋,张淑文,阴赪宏,文艳,王红,王超,王宝恩.重度脓毒症患者血清白蛋白、D-二聚体及胆碱酯酶水平的意义及预后的关系[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(2):137-139. 被引量:20
  • 3樊寻梅.儿科感染性休克(脓毒性休克)诊疗推荐方案[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(8):596-598. 被引量:205
  • 4Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012 [J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41 (2) : 580-637.
  • 5Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A, et al. International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis: International pediatric sepsis consensus conference : definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics [J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2005, 6 (1) : 2-8.
  • 6Russell NE, Pachorek RE. Clindamycin in the treatment of streptococcal and staphylococcal toxic shock syndromes [ J ]. Ann Pharmacother, 2000, 34 (7/8): 936-939.
  • 7Ngo NT, Cao XT, Kneen R, et al. Acute management of dengue shock syndrome: A randomized double-blind comparison of 4 intravenous fluid regimens in the first hour [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 2001, 32 (2): 204-213.
  • 8Willis BA, Dung NM, Ha TL, et al. Comparison of three fluid solutions for resuscitation in dengue shock syndrome [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353 (9): 877-889.
  • 9Dung NM, Day NP, Tam DT, et al. Fluid replacement in dengue shock syndrome: a randomized, double-blind comparison of four intravenous-fluid regimens [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1999, 29 (4) : 787-794.
  • 10Booy R, Habibi P, Nadel S, et al. Meningococcal Research Group: reduction in case fatality rate from meningoeoccal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery [ J]. Arch Dis Child, 2001, 85 (5) : 386-390.

共引文献81

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部