期刊文献+

反展厅现象与消费者质量期望的关系研究 被引量:7

Relationship between webrooming and consumer quality expectations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在展厅和反展厅现象同时发生的情形下,本研究构建一个由线下和线上零售商组成的双寡头垄断市场,探讨消费者的非电子属性的质量期望对反展厅购买行为,以及线下和线上商店之间的价格竞争的影响和作用.研究结果显示,在非电子属性的质量期望是外生给定的情形中,当非电子属性的质量期望小于真实值时,随着消费者对非电子属性质量的期望越低,线下和线上零售商的价格越高.此时线上零售商的均衡利润可能先增加后减少,而线下零售商的均衡利润总是减少;当非电子属性的质量期望值大于真实值时,允许反展厅现象存在,可能是线上零售商的最优决策.进一步,内生化非电子属性的质量期望时,产品的电子属性质量越高对线上零售商可能产生负面或正面影响越大. This paper studies how consumers’quality expectations on non-digital attributes affect the pricing strategies and revenue of the both retailers in a duopoly market formed by online and offline retailers,when both showrooming and webromming exist at the same time.The results indicate that,when consumers’quality expectations of non-digital atributes are exogenous,and when the quality expectations of non-digital atributes are less than their true value,the less the quality expectations consumers possess,the higher the products are priced by both offline and online retailers.Besides,the equilibrium profits of online retailers would decrease finally after an initial increase,while that of offline retailers would always decrease.However,when the quality expectations of non-digital attributes are more than the true value,it might be optimal for online retailers to let webroorming exist.Furthermore,when the expectations are endogenous,the higher the digital attributes of products,the more negative or positive the influence on online retailers.
作者 王战青 杨德锋 冉伦 WANG Zhan-qing;YANG De-feng;RAN Lun(School of Management and Economics,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China;School of Management,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期71-88,共18页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472074,71872073) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(19JNYH02) 暨南大学企业发展研究所经费资助项目。
关键词 非电子属性 质量期望 展厅现象 反展厅现象 non-digital attributes quality expectations showrooming webrooming
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1谢庆华,黄培清.Internet环境下混合市场渠道协调的数量折扣模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(8):1-11. 被引量:74
  • 2Bell D E.Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J].Operations Research,1982,30 (September/October):961-981.
  • 3Loomes G,Sugden R.Regret theory:An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty[J].Economic Journal,1982,92(December):805-824.
  • 4Inman J J,Dyer J S,Jia J.A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation[J].Marketing Science,1999,16 (2):97-111.
  • 5Inman J J,Zeelenberg M.Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions:The attenuating role of decision justifiability[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2002,29 (June):116-128.
  • 6Taylor K A.A regret theory approach to assessing consumer satisfaction[J].Marketing Letters,1997,8 (April):229-238.
  • 7Tsiros M,Mittal V.Regret:A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2000,26 (March):401-417.
  • 8Zeenlenberg M,Pieters R.Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction:A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in Iailed services[J].Journal of Business Research,2004,57 (April):445-455.
  • 9Rust R T,Inman J J,Jia J,et al.What you don' t know about consumer perceived quality:The role of consumer expectation distributions[J].Marketing Science,1999,18 (1):77-92.
  • 10Boulding W,Kalra A,Staelin R.The quality double whammy[J].Marketing Science,1999,18 (4):463-484.

共引文献63

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部