期刊文献+

Comparison of visual quality after implantation of Al-UV and SN60WF aspheric intraocular lens 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To compare the visual performance of pseudophakic eyes implanted with Al-UV and SN60WF aspheric intraocular lens(IOL),and to investigate the correlations between visual quality parameters and pupil size.METHODS:This prospective comparative study included 105 eyes of 90 patients with age-related cataract who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification.The subjects were divided into two groups according to the implanted IOL type.Three months postoperatively,visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured,wave-front aberrations were assessed using a KR-IW aberrometer(Topcon),and objective optical quality parameters were performed using an optical quality analysis system-OQAS Il(Visiometrics).Independent sample Mest and Spearman correlation analysis were used for data analysis.RESULTS:There were no significant differences found in visual acuity,contrast sensitivity and visual quality parameters between the two groups(P>0.05).The measured intraocular spherical aberration(SA)in Al-UV IOL eyes of-0.19±0.05 pm was close to the designed SA value of-0.20 pm.The modulation transfer function cutoff,Strehl ratio and OQAS values were negatively correlated with pupil size in both groups(P<0.01).CONCLUSION:The subjective and objective visual quality in pseudophakic eyes with A1-UV and SN60WF IOLs are comparable.For aspheric IOL eyes,visual quality decreases with increasing pupil size.
出处 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2020年第11期1727-1732,共6页 国际眼科杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Project of Science&Technology Department of Sichuan Province(No.2019YJ0381) Key Project of Sichuan Health and Family Planning Commission(No.18ZD022).
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1姚克.非球面人工晶状体会全面取代球面人工晶状体吗?[J].眼科,2006,15(1):3-4. 被引量:9
  • 2郭海科,张洪洋,李海武,金海鹰,陈艳蕾.非球面和球面人工晶状体植入术后高阶像差的比较[J].眼科,2007,16(2):96-99. 被引量:7
  • 3Gtiell JL, Pujol J, Arjona M, et al. Optical quality analysis system: instrument for objective clinical evaluation of ocular optical quality[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(7): 1598- 1599. Diaz-Dout6n.
  • 4F, Benito A, Pujol J, et al. Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(4): 1710-1716.
  • 5Saad A, Saab M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surq, 2010, 36(1): 28-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.033.
  • 6Kuroda T, Fujikado T, Ninomiya S, et al. Effect of aging on ocular light scatter and higher order aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg, 2002, 18(5): $598-602.
  • 7Guirao A, Gonz61ez C, Redondo M, et al. Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999, 40(1): 203- 213.
  • 8Martinez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, et al. Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population[J]. ClinExpOptom, 2011, 94(2): 223-229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00535.x.
  • 9Kamiya K, Umeda K, Kobashi H, et al. Effect of aging on optical quality and intraocular scattering using the double- pass instrument[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2012, 37(10): 884-888. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2012.688164.
  • 10van Gaalen KW, Koopmans SA, Jansonius NM, et al. Clinical comparison of the optical performance of asphefic and spherical intraocular lenses[J]. J Catarcat refractive surg,2010, 36(1):34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.06.040.

共引文献35

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部