期刊文献+

超越权利与善的优先性之争——以多重反思平衡为分析方法 被引量:6

Transcending the Priority Dispute Between Rights and Good——Taking Multiple Reflective Equilibria as the Analysis Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反思平衡建立在非基础主义和类融贯论之上,能够涵盖从主观到主观间再到客观的不同视角。从本质上说,反思平衡旨在针对分歧进行论辩,其内部存在个别与一般、单一与复多、简单与复杂的类型划分,由此得以完成对多重反思平衡的体系化建构。为超越权利与善的优先性之争,多重反思平衡将现有对权利与善的理解作为深思熟虑的判断,以此为起点使其互为参照并相互调整,进而达成追求正义原则的理想目标。虽然,反思平衡本身蕴含着实践理性,但这种实践理性终归有其限度,因此必须予以审慎对待。总体而言,围绕权利与善的多重反思平衡将始终处于开放与动态之中,由此体现出人们对正义的不懈追求。 The reflective equilibria is based on the non-foundationalism and approximate coherentism,as well as covering different perspectives from subjective to intersubjective and then to objective.Essentially,the reflective equilibria aims to argue against differences.There are individual and general,single and multiple,as well as simple and complex types within it,so the systematic construction of multiple reflective equilibria can be completed.In order to transcend the priority dispute between rights and good,the multiple reflective equilibria will take the existing understanding of rights and good as considered judgments,and use these as the starting point to make them refer to each other and make adjustments,then achieve the ideal goal of pursuing justice principle.The reflective equilibria itself contains practical reason,but this reason has its limit,so it must be treated with caution.In general,the multiple reflective equilibria between rights and good will always be open and dynamic,thus reflect people’s unremitting pursuit of justice.
作者 曹晟旻 Cao Shengmin
出处 《文史哲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期143-156,168,共15页 Literature,History,and Philosophy
基金 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目“法治中国背景下权利与善的优先性关系研究”(2020T130622) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“总体国家安全观视阈下的基因隐私权保护研究”(20YJC820004)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘莘.对罗尔斯宣言的一种解读[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2):84-93. 被引量:3
  • 2刘莘.“原初地位”的地位[J].世界哲学,2007(3):66-76. 被引量:2
  • 3John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts; The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 20,p. 47.
  • 4John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971,p. 120,p. 46,p. 51,p. 587.
  • 5斯宾诺莎.《伦理学》.第五部分,命题二十九,北京,商务印书馆,1983.
  • 6R. M. Hare, "Rawls'Theory of Justice", in Norman Daniels(edited), Reading Rawls, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989, p. 82.
  • 7T. M. Scanlon, "Rawls on Justification", in Samuel Freeman (edited), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 152-153.
  • 8Norman Daniels, "Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics", in Chandran Kukathas(edited), John Rawls, Volume I, London and New York.. Routledge,2003, p. 170.
  • 9米勒.《社会正义原则》,南京:江苏人民出版社2001年,第28-38页.
  • 10罗尔斯.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第135页.

共引文献19

同被引文献95

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部