期刊文献+

氯吡格雷及替格瑞洛对老年急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效与安全性探讨 被引量:6

Curative effects and safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on senile acute coronary syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)对老年及高龄老年急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的疗效和安全性。方法选择急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的老年ACS患者479例,随机分为老年氯吡格雷组(A组)172例、老年替格瑞洛组(B组)161例、高龄老年氯吡格雷组(C组)79例和高龄老年替格瑞洛组(D组)67例,分别应用氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林的DAPT,观察PCI后TIMI血流分级、心肌灌注分级(TMPG)、主要并发症及1年随访出血事件和主要终点的变化。结果替格瑞洛组(B组和D组)PCI后TIMI 3级血流、TMPG 3级心肌灌注显著高于氯吡格雷组(A组和C组,P<0.05),梗死后心绞痛、严重心律失常和KillipⅢ级以上心功能的发生率显著低于氯吡格雷组(A组和C组,P<0.05);总出血和中度出血的发生率高于氯吡格雷组(A组和C组,P<0.05)严重出血的发生率高龄老年替格瑞洛组(D组)高于老年氯吡格雷组(A组,P<0.05);高龄老年组(C组和D组)主要终点和全因死亡的发生率高于老年组(A组和B组,P<0.05);次要有效终点高于老年氯吡格雷组(A组,P<0.05)。结论与氯吡格雷对比:替格瑞洛可改善老年和高龄老年ACS患者PCI后心肌血流灌注,减少缺血并发症的发生,但出血并发症较高。 Objective To discuss the curative effects and safety of clopidogrel or ticagrelor combined with aspirin in dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT)in aged and advanced-aged patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS).Methods The elderly ACS patients undergone emergency PCI(n=479)were chosen and divided into aged clopidogrel group(group A,n=172),aged ticagrelor group(group B,n=161),advanced-aged clopidogrel group(group C,n=79)and advanced-aged ticagrelor(group D,n=67).DAPT of clopidogrel combined with aspirin and DAPT of ticagrelor combined with aspirin were respectively administrated,and changes of TIMI flow grades,TIMI myocardial perfusion grade(TMPG),major complications and bleeding events and major end-point events were observed after PCI.Results TIMI flow grade 3 and TMPG 3 after PCI were significantly higher in groups B and D than those in groups A and C(P<0.05).The incidence rates of post-infarction angina pectoris,severe arrhythmia and Killip gradeⅢwere significantly lower in groups B and D than those in groups A and C(P<0.05).The incidence rates of total bleeding events and medium bleeding were higher in groups B and D than those in groups A and C(P<0.05),and incidence rate of severe bleeding was higher in group D than that in group A(P<0.05).The incidence rates of major end-point events and all-cause mortality were higher in groups C and D than those in groups A and B(P<0.05).The incidence rate of secondary end-point events was higher in groups C and D than that in group A(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with clopidogrel,ticagrelor can relieve myocardial flow perfusion,reduce ischemia complications but increase bleeding complications in aged and advance-aged patients with ACS.
作者 陈奇 刘洋 衡紫微 姬劲锐 张胜豪 马超 刘恒亮 Chen Qi;Liu Yang;Heng Ziwei;Ji Jinrui;Zhang Shenghao;Ma Chao;Liu Hengliang(Department of Cardiology,People's Hospital of Zhengzhou City,Southern Medical University,Zhengzhou 450003,China;不详)
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2021年第3期337-341,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 郑州市创新型科技人才队伍建设项目(096SYJH331144)。
关键词 老年 急性冠脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 抗血小板 出血 Elderly Acute coronary syndrome Percutaneous coronary intervention Antiplatelet Bleeding
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性sT段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2010,:675-675.
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.

共引文献501

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部