期刊文献+

跨期选择损益不对称:从现象到心理机制 被引量:3

Gain-Loss Asymmetry of Intertemporal Choices:From Effects to Psychological Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 损益不对称是跨期选择中非常稳定的现象之一,即相对于收益,在损失跨期选择中,决策者表现出更小甚至是负的折扣率。过往研究一般仅是发现现象和探讨原因,而近来的研究开始检验损益不对称现象的心理机制。本文从损益结果效用的不对称性、延迟知觉的不对称性以及折扣不对称三方面总结了损益不对称心理机制研究的进展。最后,本文提出未来需要从损益结果可能的不同加工策略、损益序列比较和过程方法研究等方面加强研究。 Gain-loss asymmetry is a robust phenomenon in intertemporal choice,that is,compared with intertemporal choice with gains,decision-makers show a smaller,even a negative discount rate in those with losses.Previous studies on gain-loss asymmetry usually only showed this phenomenon and discussed possible reasons;however,recent research began to examine the underlying psychological mechanisms.This paper summarizes the progress in the study of psychological mechanism of gain-loss asymmetry from the following three aspects:asymmetry utility of gain and loss,asymmetry perceptions of delay duration and asymmetry of discounting functions.Finally,this paper proposes that future research needs to be strengthened in terms of possible distinct processing strategies for gains and losses outcomes,further comparison of gain and loss sequences,and diverse processing research methods to study intertemporal choice.
作者 江程铭 王蕾 马家涛 陈李娜 何铨 JIANG Cheng-ming;WANG Lei;MA Jia-tao;CHEN Li-na;HE Quan(School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China;College of Public Administration,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2021年第1期66-74,83,共10页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 浙江省自然科学基金面上项目(LY19C090003) 国家自然科学基金管理学部专项(71942004) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571164) 教育部人文社科基金项目(16YJC840006) 2020年浙江工业大学人文社科预研基金项目,浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划暨新苗人才计划项目(2019R403074)。
关键词 损失跨期选择 损益不对称 负折扣 心理机制 intertemporal choice with losses gain-loss asymmetry negative discounting rate psychological mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献80

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3653
  • 2林晓梅.(2007).跨时间序列偏好研究.硕士论文.浙江大学.
  • 3Chapman, G. B. ( 1996 ). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ,22,771 - 791.
  • 4Elster, J. , & Loewenstein, G. ( 1992 ). Utility from memory and anticipation. In J. Elster, & G. Loewenstein( Eds. ) , Choice over time( pp. 213 - 234). New York : Russell Sage.
  • 5Frederick, S. , Loewenstein, G. , & O' Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference : A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature,40,351 - 401.
  • 6Green, L. , & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabi- listic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130,769 - 792.
  • 7Hardisty, D. J. , & Weber, E. U. ( 2009 ). Discounting future green:Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General ,138,329 - 340.
  • 8Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica ,47,263 - 292.
  • 9Kahneman, D. , Fredrickson, B. L. , Schreiber, C. A. , & Redelmeier, D. A. ( 1993 ). When more pain is preferred to less:adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4,401 - 405.
  • 10Kalenscher, T. & Pennartz, C. M. A. ( 2008 ) Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision making. Progress in Neurobiology , 84, 284 -315.

共引文献29

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部