期刊文献+

比较基因组杂交微阵列技术在唐氏综合征血清学筛查结果异常孕妇产前诊断中的应用 被引量:3

Application of Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Diagnostic Assessment of Abnormal Prenatal Serological Screening Results of Down’s Syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨比较基因组杂交微阵列(array-based comparative genomic hybridization,a-CGH)技术在唐氏综合征血清学筛查(简称唐筛)结果异常孕妇产前诊断中的应用。方法选取单纯因唐筛结果异常、并行羊膜腔穿刺取羊水标本进行产前检查诊断的单胎孕妇3578例为研究对象,将其分为3组:唐筛高风险组(2624例)、唐筛临界风险组(662例)及唐筛单项中位数的倍数(multiples of median,MoM)值异常组(292例)。采用CGX^(TM)(8×60K)芯片对其羊水进行a-CGH检测,并采用Genoglyphix■软件进行分析。结果3578例羊水标本中,a-CGH分析共检出染色体异常121例,总体异常检出率为3.38%,其中非整倍体60例,占49.59%;致病性拷贝数变异51例,占42.15%;可能致病拷贝数变异10例,占8.26%。检出不明意义拷贝数变异37例,占总数的1.03%。唐筛高风险组、唐筛临界风险组及唐筛单项MoM值异常组的总体异常检出率分别为3.54%(93/2624)、2.87%(19/662)及3.08%(9/292);致病性和可能致病拷贝数变异检出率分别为1.64%(43/2624)、1.81%(12/662)及2.05%(6/292);18-及21-三体检出率分别为1.37%(36/2624)、0.76%(5/662)及0.34%(1/292),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。a-CGH漏检染色体异常1例,荧光原位杂交诊断为X(51)/XYY(49)。结论a-CGH技术在唐筛结果异常的孕妇产前诊断中不仅可以检测非整倍体异常,还可以检出微缺失/微重复综合征等染色体拷贝数变异。 Objective To explore the application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization(a-CGH) technology in the prenatal diagnostic assessment of abnormal serological prenatal screening results of Down’s syndrome(DS).Methods A total of 3578 amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis solely due to abnormal serological prenatal screening results were selected.The samples were categorized into 3 groups,2624 in the high-risk group,662 in the borderline-risk group,and 292 in the abnormal multiple of median(MoM)group.a-CGH was performed on the Agilent CGX^(TM)(8×60 K)platform and the data were analyzed by the Genoglyphix■software.Results The overall detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.38%(121/3578).Among the chromosomal abnormalities,49.59%(60/121)was aneuploidies,42.15%(51/121)was pathogenic copy number variants(pCNVs),and 8.26%(10/121)was likely pathogenic CNVs(lpCNVs).The detection rate of copy number variant of uncertain significance(VUS)was 1.03%(37/3578).In the high-risk,the borderline-risk and the abnormal MoM groups,the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3.54%(93/2624),2.87%(19/662)and 3.08%(9/292),respectively;the detection rate of p/lp CNVs was 1.64%(43/2624),1.81%(12/662)and 2.05%(6/292),respectively;the detection rate of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 was 1.37%(36/2624),0.76%(5/662)and 0.34%(1/292)in the three groups,respectively.There were no significant differences in all the detection rate among these groups(P>0.05).One sample with X(51)/XYY(49)confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)was misdiagnosed by a-CGH.Conclusion Prenatal diagnosis with a-CGH is of great significance for reducing birth defects in pregnancies with abnormal serological prenatal screening results of DS.It can also be used to detect CNVs of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes.
作者 胡睿 胡婷 张竹 王嘉敏 李勤琴 杨运源 肖莉柯 朱红梅 李玲萍 张李李 王和 刘珊玲 HU Rui;HU Ting;ZHANG Zhu;WANG Jia-min;LI Qin-qin;YANG Yun-yuan;XIAO Li-ke;ZHU Hong-mei;LI Ling-ping;ZHANG Li-li;WANG He;LIU Shan-ling(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children(Sichuan University),Ministry of Education,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第2期319-325,共7页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(No.2018YFC1002203)资助。
关键词 染色体微阵列分析 比较基因组杂交微阵列 拷贝数变异 血清学筛查 产前诊断 Chromosome microarray analysis Array-based comparative genomic hybridization Copy number variants Serological prenatal screening Prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献115

  • 1胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查与诊断技术标准 第2部分:胎儿染色体异常的细胞遗传学产前诊断技术标准[J].中国产前诊断杂志(电子版),2011(4):46-59. 被引量:28
  • 2Eloranta ML, Heinonen S, Kirkinen P. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy has no effect on maternal serum second trimester alpha-fetoprotein and HCG [ J]. Acta-Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000, 79(6) : 548 -552.
  • 3Summers AM, Farrell SA, Huang T, et al. Maternal serum screening in ontario using the triple marker test [ J ]. J Med Screen, 2003,10 (2) :107 -111.
  • 4Wald N J, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, et al. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome [J ] . J Med Screen, 1997,4(2) :181 -246.
  • 5Cuckle HS, Vanlith JM. App rop ridte biochemical parameters in first-trimester screening for Down syndrome [ J ]. Prenat Diagn, 1999, 19(6) : 505 -512.
  • 6Mao X, Orchard G, Lillington DM, et al. Amplification and overexpression of JUNB is associated with primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Blcod,2003, 101(4): 1513-1519.
  • 7Sanchez-Izquierdo D, Buchonnet G, Siebert R, et al. MALT1 is deregulated by both chromosomal translocation and amplification in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood,2003, 101 ( 11 ): 4539-4546.
  • 8Weiss MM, Kuipers EJ, Postma C, et al. Genomie profiling of gastric cancer predicts lymph node status and survival. Oncogene,2003,22( 12): 1872-1879.
  • 9Wilhelm M, Veltman JA, Olshen AB, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the differential diagnosis of renal cell cancer. Cancer Res, 2002,62 (4): 957-960.
  • 10Snijders AM, Fridlyand J, Mans DA, et al. Shaping of tumor and drug-resistant genomes by instability and selection. Oncogene,2003,22( 28 ): 4370-4379.

共引文献390

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部