期刊文献+

ICCPR框架下环境人权法理新发展——基于波蒂略案来文意见的分析 被引量:3

New Development of the Jurisprudence of Environmental Human Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:Analysis of Portillo Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay and Beyond
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际法层面环境人权的法理沿循"扩权型""程序型""创权型"三种路径演进。环境人权法理的不同演进路径之间有着紧密联系的规范基础。在《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》(ICCPR)框架下,环境人权主要表现为实体及程序人权在环境领域的扩展适用。在环境人权偏重"创权型"的发展过程中,ICCPR发挥的作用相对有限,这主要源于基本人权规范的时代局限及执行机构的保守性。联合国人权事务委员会在2019年Portillo Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay(波蒂略案)来文意见中一改以往对环境人权诉求的回避姿态,确认了环境保护与人权之间不可否认的规范联系,并第一次明确阐述了ICCPR框架下环境人权的法理。该案相对系统地揭示了环境保护与生命权、个人和家庭生活权之间的规范联系,这为ICCPR在环境人权法理演进过程中继续发挥作用奠定了初步基础。 "Environmental human rights" at the international level has largely evolved along three paths, namely, expansion of existing human rights,application of procedural environmental rights, and pursuit of an independent right to environment. Basically, these three types of environmental human rights have developed on different but closely related normative basis. Under ICCPR, the evolution of environmental human rights mainly shows as the extensive application of extant human rights, either substantive or procedural, into environment related issues. Basically, the right to environment has gained much momentum in the process. However, the fundamental human rights norms, of which ICCPR as an essential part, had played very limited role in human rights approach to environment protection due to, inter alia, absence of specific norms and entrenchment of institutional inertia. In the landmark case Portillo Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay, the United Nations Human Rights Committee changed its evasive attitude vis-a-vis environmental claims, instead, it confirmed the undeniable link between the environment and human rights. And for the first time, the Committee develops its jurisprudence of environmental human rights under ICCPR. The case expounded the normative connection between environmental protection and the right to life as well as the right to respect for private and family life, upon which ICCPR is expected to contribute more to the evolution of environmental human rights as a whole.
作者 李将 LI Jiang
出处 《武大国际法评论》 2021年第1期52-71,共20页 Wuhan University International Law Review
关键词 公民权利与政治权利国际公约 波蒂略案 环境人权 生命权 个人和家庭生活权 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR) Portillo Cáceres et al.v.Paraguay environmental human rights right to life right to respect for private and family life
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1陈新民著.《宪法学导论》[M].台湾三民书局,1996年版.第160-169页.
  • 2林腾鹞著.《中华民国宪法》[M].台湾三民书局,1997年版.第130-144页.
  • 3[日]杉原泰雄著 吕昶译.《宪法的历史—比较宪法学新论》[M].社会科学文献出版社,2000年版.第115-116页.
  • 4李建良.《论环境保护与人权保障之关系》[J].《东吴大学法律学报》,.
  • 5David Short, A~sing the Utility of a Human Rights Approach to International Environmental Protection, UMI Company, 2000, p. 85 - 86.
  • 6[日]宇都宫深志 [日]加藤一郎 王家福主编.《城市的环境质量与阿美尼梯行政的开展》[A].[日]加藤一郎,王家福主编.《民法和环境法的诸问题》[C].中国人民大学出版社,1995年版.第122页.
  • 7MCGOLDRICK. The Human Rights Committee[ M]. Ox- ford : Clarendon Press, 1991.
  • 8ALAN BOYLE. Human Rights and the Environment: A Reassessment[ J]. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 2008(18) :471 - 511.
  • 9杨松才.国际人权法中的环境权——以经社文权利公约为视角[J].学术界,2007(6):282-286. 被引量:4
  • 10Bums H. Weston & David Bollier. Green Governance-- Ecological Survival, Human Rights, and The Law of The Commons[ M]. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

共引文献399

同被引文献28

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部