期刊文献+

基于两种无损检测方法在桥梁结构损伤检测上的应用与分析 被引量:6

Application and analysis of bridge structure damage detection based on two non-destructive testing methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 桥梁在长期使用中难免发生结构损伤,通过人工识别、水准量测很难进行快速筛查及准定位损伤,或对突发事件后的桥梁状况进行快速评估,关系到桥梁的寿命和人民的生命财产安全。以敲击法和毫米波雷达检测技术在桥梁检测上的应用为例,通过理论分析、案例论证及传统测量方法进行对比分析。结果表明:敲击扫描检测方法同人工检测方法相比其准确度为94.4%,漏检率为5.6%;毫米波雷达在检测中与精密水准测量差值结果中误差为-0.13mm,各级加载挠度最大差值为-0.33mm,最小差值为0.06mm,弹性挠度值差值为0.06mm,以百分表的弹性挠度值为基准,相对误差为1%。表明敲击法和毫米波雷达检测技术在桥梁检测上能够提升桥梁探伤检测评估的速度,其准确度和可靠性较高。 Bridges will inevitably have structural damage in long-term use.It is difficult to quickly screen and quasi-locate damage through manual identification and leveling,or to quickly assess the condition of the bridge after an emergency.This is related to the life of the bridge and National life and property safety.This article takes the application of tapping method and millimeter wave radar detection technology in bridge inspection as an example.Through theoretical analysis,case demonstration and comparative analysis with traditional measurement methods,the results show that the tapping scanning detection method is more accurate than the manual detection method.The detection rate is 94.4%,and the missed detection rate is 5.6%;the difference between millimeter-wave radar and precision leveling measurement is-0.13mm,the maximum difference of loading deflection at each level is-0.33mm,and the minimum difference is 0.06mm.The deflection value difference is 0.06mm,based on the elastic deflection value of the dial indicator,and the relative error is 1%.It shows that percussion method and millimeter wave radar detection technology can improve the speed of bridge flaw detection and evaluation in bridge detection,and its accuracy and reliability are high.
作者 韩伟 王余鹏 王亮 HAN Wei;WANG Yu-peng;WANG Liang(Fujian Forestry Vocational and Technical College,Nanping 353000,Fujian,China;China Railway 24th Bureau,Shanghai 200092,China)
出处 《贵阳学院学报(自然科学版)》 2021年第1期93-99,共7页 Journal of Guiyang University:Natural Sciences
基金 福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目(项目编号:JAT191259)。
关键词 结构损伤 敲击法 雷达检测 对比分析 准确度 可靠性 Structural damage Percussion method Radar detection Comparative analysis Accuracy reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1向志海,戴晓玮,张尧,陆秋海.敲击扫描式梁式结构损伤检测方法[J].固体力学学报,2011,32(S1):225-228. 被引量:11
  • 2IS016047. Fasteners -Torque/clamp force testing [SJ. 2005.
  • 3TODD M D, NICHOLS J M, et al. An assessment of modal property effectiveness in detecting bolted joint degradation: theory and experiment [JJ. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 275:1113-1126.
  • 4AMERINI F. MEO M. Structural health monitoring of bolted joints using linear and nonlinear acoustic/ultrasound methods [JJ. Structural Health Monitoring. 2011, 10(6): 659-672.
  • 5YANG J, CHANG F K. Detection of bolt loosening in C-C composite thermal protection panels: I. Diagnostic principle [J]. Smart Mater. Struct .? 2006.15(2): 581-590.
  • 6HARTWIGSENA C J. SONGB Y. MCFARLAND D M. et al. Experimental study of non-linear effects in a typical shear lap joint configuration [JJ. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 277 I 327 - 351.
  • 7CAWLEY P. ADAMS R D. The mechanics of the coin-tap method of non-destructive testing [JJ. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1988. 122: 299-316.
  • 8CAWLEY r, ADAMS R D. Sensitivity of the coin-tap method of non-destructive testing [J]. Materials Evaluation. 1989,47: 558-563.
  • 9XIANG Z H. DAI X W. ZHANG v, et al. The tap-scan method for damage detection of bridge structures [JJ. Interaction and Multiscale Mechanics. 2010, 3: 173-191.
  • 10ZHANG Y, WANG L Q, XIANG Z H. Damage detection by mode shape squares extracted from a passing vehicle [JJ. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2012, 331: 291- 307.

共引文献34

同被引文献49

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部