期刊文献+

基于能力本位的高职课程学习成果真实性评价模式 被引量:2

Study on the Competency-Based Authentic Assessment Model of Course Learning Outcomes in Higher Vocational Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 真实性评价迎合了当代高职教育人才培养改革和发展的需要。真实性评价中的"真实",是要求在课程学习成果评价的任务、能力、产出、标准四个要素上同时体现真实性,是对高职能力本位教学实践的补充与衔接。通过与职场现实工作情境及评价操作的参照比对,构建高职课程真实性评价设计模型,按照评价设计过程分为六个环节:能力要求、评价任务、任务条件、学生成果、评分规则、评分情境,并在真实性评价体系设计中融入对评价信度和效度的考量,以期促进真实性评价在教学实践中的应用。 The authentic assessment caters to the reform and development of talent training in modern higher vocational education.The"authenticity"in the authentic assessment requires that the task,capacity,outcome and standard of the course learning outcomes simultaneously reflect the"truth,"It is a complement and connection to the teaching practice based on capacity in higher vocational education.This paper constructs a model of authentic assessment of higher vocational courses by comparing the actual work situation and evaluation operation in the workplace.According to the assessment design process,it is divided into six links:competency requirements,assessment tasks,task conditions,student achievements,rubrics,scoring contexts,and reliability and validity factors are integrated into the design of an authentic assessment system,in order to promote the application of authentic assessment in teaching practice.
作者 殷明 刘珊珊 YIN Ming;LIU Shanshan(Guangzhou South China Business Trade College,Guangzhou Guangdong 510663)
出处 《当代职业教育》 2021年第2期89-97,共9页 Contemporary Vocational Education
基金 2019年度广东高校科研平台和项目(特色创新类)“基于OBE理念的人工智能应用技术课程的教学研究与实践”(编号:2019GWTSCX077)。
关键词 能力本位 学习成果 真实性评价 评价效度 competency-based learning outcomes authentic assessment evaluative validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献86

  • 1邵力,相志利,焦仁普.关于职业技术院校学生职业能力的评价[J].廊坊师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,6(2):5-7. 被引量:6
  • 2张向众,李永珺.真实性评价和课堂教学的整合[J].外国教育研究,2004,31(8):42-46. 被引量:20
  • 3周尹黎.课堂评估中的真实性评价[J].中国商界,2008(4):212-213. 被引量:3
  • 4杨金土.以人为本的职业教育价值观[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(1):65-68. 被引量:86
  • 5俎媛媛.美国真实性学生评价及其启示[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(03B):62-66. 被引量:36
  • 6Rodney L.Custer.Using Authentic Assessment in Vocational Education,[EB/OL].2000.Source:http://www-tcall.tamu.edu/erica/mp_custer_01.asp.
  • 7Newmann, F. M. & Wehlage, G. G.. Five Standards for Authentic Instruction[J].Educational Leadership, 1993(7): 8-12.
  • 8Gulikers, J.T.M., Th.J. Bastiaens,P.A. Kirschner, and L. Kester. Relations between Student Perceptions of Assessment Authenticity, Study Approach and Learning Outcome [J].Studies in Educational Evaluation 2006(32): 381-400.
  • 9Stein, S.J., G. Isaacs, and T. Andrews. Incorporating Authentic Learning Experiences Within a University Course [J]. Studies in Higher Education 2004(29): 239-58.
  • 10Struyven, K., Dochy, F. & Janssens, S. Students' Perceptions about New Modes of Assessment in Higher Education: a Review, in: M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: in Search of Qualities and Standards (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers), 2003.

共引文献103

同被引文献3

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部