期刊文献+

Liberal education的多重涵义及其现代意义:一个类型学的历史分析 被引量:7

The Multiple Meanings of Liberal Education and Its Modern Significance:A Historical and Typological Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Liberal education是西方教育思想史中的几个核心概念之一,但学界对这一概念的认识长期被其模糊性所困扰。本文通过思想史和类型学方法,对这一概念在历史上形成的多重涵义进行了梳理。研究发现,liberal education一词在历史上具有十种主要的语义,这十种语义分别从教育对象(自由人、绅士、自由公民)、功能(非功利教育、通识性教育、心智自由、心智训练)和内容(古典教育、人文学、文理学科)三个维度对这一概念进行了界定。这一概念在不同历史时期沉淀的语义一方面是“相互论证”的,另一方面也存在不一致甚至冲突之处。从课程实践角度来看,深入分析liberal education的多重涵义对于当下的本科教育改革也具有一定的启发价值。在未来的大学课程改革中,应更多强调通识课程的心智训练价值和公民素质培养的价值。 The term "liberal education"is one of several core concepts in the history of western educational thought,but its understanding has long been debated due to its vagueness.This article uses methods of typology and intellectual history to sort out the multiple meanings of this concept in history.Studies have found that "liberal education"has ten main semantic meanings in history.These ten meanings range from educational objects(freeman,gentlemen,free citizens),functions(non-utilitarian education, mental training, mental freedom,and general education)and content(classical education,humanities,liberal arts and sciences).On the one hand,the definitions of this concept originated from different historical periods were mutually supportive,but on the other hand,there were inconsistencies and even conflicts between these meanings.From the perspective of curriculum practice,an in-depth analysis of the multiple meanings of liberal education also has important implications for improving the current undergraduate education reform.In future university curriculum reforms,more emphasis should be placed on the value of mental training and civic engagement in general education.
作者 沈文钦 SHEN Wenqin
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期17-43,190,共28页 Peking University Education Review
基金 陈一丹基金会资助课题“博雅教育的跨国史:从英国、美国到中国”。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献106

  • 1廖申白.亚里士多德的技艺概念:图景与问题[J].哲学动态,2006(1):34-39. 被引量:27
  • 2柏拉图.理想国[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002..
  • 3亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003..
  • 4亚里士多德 廖申白译.尼各马可伦理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 5[英]培根.新工具[M].许宝骙译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
  • 6[德]伊曼努尔·康德.论教育学[M].赵鹏,译.上海:世纪出版集团,上海人民出版社,2005:3,8.
  • 7[法]笛卡尔.谈谈方法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.3.
  • 8[英]梅尔茨.十九世纪欧洲思想史[M].周昌忠译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 9Haskins. Kant, Autonomy, and Art for Art's Sake. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1990:235-237
  • 10Lenore O'Boyle. Learning for Its Own Sake : The German University as Nineteenth-Century Model. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol. 25,No. 1. (Jan., 1983), p. 22.

共引文献36

同被引文献77

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部