临床护理路径在慢性支气管炎患者护理中的应用效果

Application Effect of Clinical Nursing Path in the Nursing of Patients with Chronic Bronchitis

目的分析慢性支气管炎患者采取临床护理路径干预的临床效果。方法本次采取随机数字表法,将我院于2018年1月至2019年1月收治的84例慢性支气管炎患者分成两组,每组42例。其中,对照组实施常规护理措施,观察组则实施临床护理路径干预措施,比较两组护理效果。结果护理前,两组患者咳嗽、咳痰、喘息、气促、肺部湿啰音五项症状积分比较无差异(P>0.05);护理后,观察组患者咳嗽、咳痰、喘息、气促、肺部湿啰音5项症状积分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。在护理总满意度方面,观察组(95.24%)明显高于对照组(71.43%)(P<0.05)。在并发症发生率上,观察组(4.76%)明显低于对照组(21.43%)(P<0.05)。结论在临床中针对慢性支气管炎患者,实施临床护理路径干预方法的效果显著,可缓解患者的临床症状,提高患者对护理服务的满意程度。

Objective To analyze the clinical effects of the intervention of clinical nursing pathways in patients with chronic bronchitis.Methods This time,the random number table method was adopted to divide the 84 patients with chronic bronchitis admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 into two groups,with 42 cases in each group.Among them,the control group implemented routine nursing measures,and the observation group implemented clinical nursing path intervention measures to compare the nursing effects of the two groups.Results Before nursing,there was no difference in the scores of the five symptoms of cough,sputum,wheezing,shortness of breath,and pulmonary rales between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing,the observation group had cough,sputum,wheezing,and shortness of breath.The five symptom scores of pulmonary rales were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).In terms of total nursing satisfaction,the observation group(95.24%)was significantly higher than the control group(71.43%)(P<0.05).In terms of complication rate,the observation group(4.76%)was significantly lower than the control group(21.43%)(P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinic,for patients with chronic bronchitis,the effect of implementing clinical nursing pathway intervention methods is significant,which can relieve patients'clinical symptoms and improve patients'satisfaction with nursing services.