期刊文献+

基于小波分解的水中电爆炸冲击波波形重建方法研究 被引量:4

Reconstruction method of shock wave shape of underwater electric explosion based on wavelet decomposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水中金属丝电爆炸产生的冲击波,上升时间仅有数十纳秒,脉冲宽度仅为十几微秒,远小于化学炸药产生的冲击波,采用现有传感器对其进行精确测量非常困难。分析了冲击波波形形成过程,基于帕塞瓦尔时频域能量守恒定律,采用多尺度小波分解的方法,给出了一种冲击波波形重建方法。采用该方法对PCB138传感器实测的压力信号进行了重建,并与Müller-plate针式压力传感器得到的波形进行了比对。结果表明:重建后的信号更加接近真实波形,基于多尺度小波分解的波形重建算法,较基于傅立叶变换的重建算法,稳定性更好,准确度更高。 The rise time and pulse width of shock wave generated by electric explosion of metal wire in water are only several tens of nanoseconds and more than ten microseconds, they are far less than those of shock wave generated by chemical explosives. It is very difficult to accurately measure shock wave with existing sensors. Here, the process of shock wave shape formation was analyzed. Based on Parseval energy conservation law in time and frequency domains, a method of shock wave shape reconstruction was proposed by using the multi-scale wavelet decomposition method. This method was used to reconstruct the pressure signal measured with PCB138 sensor, and its waveform was compared with that obtained with Müller-plate needle type pressure sensor. The results showed that the reconstructed signal is closer to the actual waveform;the waveform reconstruction algorithm based on multi-scale wavelet decomposition has better stability and higher accuracy than the reconstruction algorithm based on Fourier transformation does.
作者 谢宇超 周海滨 陶妍 王晨旭 XIE Yuchao;ZHOU Haibin;TAO Yan;WANG Chenxu(China Shipbuilding Industry System Engineering Research Institute,Beijing 100094,China)
出处 《振动与冲击》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第5期149-153,178,共6页 Journal of Vibration and Shock
关键词 水中冲击波 冲击波测量 波形重建 多尺度小波分解 能量守恒 underwater shock waves shock wave measurement waveform reconstruction multi-scale wavelet decomposition energy conservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1赵东升.PVDF压电薄膜制作传感器的理论研究[J].计算机测量与控制,2005,13(7):748-750. 被引量:17
  • 2胡涛.压电薄膜压力分布计算机测试系统研究[J].计算机测量与控制,2005,13(9):897-899. 被引量:5
  • 3E. Swift, Jr. John P. SI,ifko, Recent Work on Measurement Ex plosion Pressures [J]. NGLTR 68- 78, 7 Aug 1968. pp. 1 - 24.
  • 4J. B. Dempsey, R. S. Price. Reduction of scatter in underwater shock wave measurements made with piezoelectric gages [R]. 4 February 1972 Naval Ordance Laboratory, White OAK, Silver Spring, Maryland AD 739319. pp. 1 - 14.
  • 5Round B. Tussing. Accuracy and Response of Tourmaline Gages for Measurement of Underwater Explosion Phenomena [R]. ADA128734. pp. 1-41.
  • 6Gerry Rude, John E. Slate. Small--scale Tank Facility for Stud ying Underwater Explosion Phenomena [A]. 69th Shock and vibra tion Symposium [C]. 1998. 10. pp. 663-673.
  • 7John E. Slater, Gerry Rude. Underwater Pressure Gauge Compari son Test Study [A]. 69th Shock and vibration Symposium [C] 1998. 10. pp. 1-16.
  • 8Donald E. Johnson, Steve R. Hogeland. PVDF Water--shock pres- sure transducer with 200- ns response [R]. DE93 00407 DEC 07 199Z SAND--92 - 2134C. pp. 1 - 12.
  • 9K. Murata, K. Takahashi, Y. Kato. Measurement of underwater shock wave by fluoropolymer sensor [A]. Proc. 23rd Int. Pyro technicsSem [C]. Tsukuba, Japan, 1997, pp. 548-560.
  • 10Kenji Murata, Katsuhiko Takahashi, Yukio Kato. Precise measure- ment of underwater explosion phenomena by pressure sensor using fluoropolymer [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 85, Tsukuba, Japan, 1999: 39-42.

共引文献11

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部