期刊文献+

论中国民航事故调查制度的完善——在“恰当文化”语境下

Improving China’s Civil Aircraft AccidentInvestigation Rules under “Just Culture”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在民航事故调查制度中引入“恰当文化”,旨在建立“安全”与“归责”之间的适度平衡,避免民航从业者因报告“无心之失”而受到惩罚,从而形成民航人员积极报告、信息共享的“安全文化”,提升民航系统的整体安全。通过分析“恰当文化”的源起与国际民航事故调查制度引入该理念的表现,明确在《芝加哥公约》及其《附件十三》的要求下,缔约各国在“涉外”和“国内”民航事故调查制度中实施“恰当文化”的义务。在总结中国现行制度不足之处的基础上,提出在“恰当文化”语境下完善中国民航事故调查制度应排除“归责性目的”以明确航空器事故调查目的唯一性、通过调查人员的独立实现航空器事故调查程序独立,纳入“平衡测试”与航空安全信息保护的规定,并对事故调查报告能否用于归责性程序等问题予以明确。 The establishment of“just culture”under the civil aircraft accident investigation system aims to achieve a proper balance between safety and accountability,under which civil aviation practitioners are encouraged to report their mistakes without the fear of being punished,so as to create a“safety culture”of free reporting and information sharing,and realize the objective of aircraft accident investigation and promote the aviation safety.This paper first starts with the origin of“just culture”and its application in the investigation of international civil aircraft accidents.Under the Chicago Convention and its Annex 13,State Parties need to apply“just culture”in their own aircraft accident investigation rules.After reviewing the problem of current rules of China’s civil aircraft accident investigation,this paper suggests that with the application of“just culture”,China’s civil aircraft accident rules should preclude the accountability to achieve the objectivity of the investigation;should achieve the independency of investigation procedures through the independency of the investigators;should determine the use of information gathered in accident investigation through the establishment of a“balance test”;and should enact the regulations regarding the use of safety information and the adoption of the investigation final report as evidence in responsibility apportion procedures.
作者 黄毓慧 张雪莹 HUANG Yuhui;ZHANG Xueying(School of International Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2021年第2期139-146,共8页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词 航空器事故调查 恰当文化 系统安全 《芝加哥公约》 《附件十三》 独立调查 aircraft accident investigation just culture system safety Chicago Convention Annex 13 independent investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1刘品新.交通事故认定书存在明显错误其法律效力如何认定?[J].中国审判,2008,0(3):68-69. 被引量:15
  • 2张宏波.美国事故调查的理念[J].劳动保护,2003(7):72-74. 被引量:8
  • 3王居.美国国家运输安全委员会概况及其在航空事故调查中的几个问题[J].民航经济与技术,1994(1):33-37. 被引量:3
  • 4翟安强.我国航空事故调查机制的建立[J].中国民用航空,2006(2):19-20. 被引量:8
  • 5张蕾.包头空难索赔立案3年后终开庭人均索赔超400万[N].北京晚报,2012-10-09(9).
  • 6National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report un- controlled descent and collision with terrain USAir Flight 427 Boeing 737-300, N513AU [ EB/OL 1. [ 2014433-03 ]. http : ff www. ntsb. gov/doclib/reports/1999/AAR9901, pdf.
  • 7郝秀梅,刘海安,杨万柳.航空保险法[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:352.
  • 8Rapoport Law Offices, P.C. Aviation accidents: frequently asked questions [ EB/OL ]. [ 2014-03-03 ]. http ://www. rapoportlaw. com/Aviation-Accidents/Aviation-Accidents-FAQ, shtml#time.
  • 9Baum Hedlund Aristei, Goldman P C. Pilot' s reaction among flight 3407 crash causes[ EB/OL]. [ 2014-03-03 ]. http: ffwww. airplanecrash -lawyer. com/CM/lntheNews/Flight -3407 -Crash-Cau- ses. asp.
  • 10中国国际航空公司4·15釜山空难调查结果公布[EB/OL].[2014-03-03].http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2005-05/08/content_2930455.htm.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部