期刊文献+

国际司法协助与合作中的“长臂管辖”及中国应对策略 被引量:9

Research on “Long Arm Jurisdiction” in International Judicial Assistance and Cooperation and China’s Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球化背景下,随着各国经济、政治、司法等相互联系程度的加深,跨国民商事案件和国际刑事犯罪活动不断增多。为诉讼便利,各国越来越重视国际司法协助与合作。与此同时,一些国家为实现自身霸权,利用国际司法协助与合作来扩大"长臂管辖"的领域和范围,触及他国正当利益。当前,我国应对"长臂管辖"尚存在诸多的不足,需要通过借鉴相关国际立法经验,制定本国专门阻断法,完善域外管辖制度以及推动构建新型规范体系来解决国际司法协助与合作中的"长臂管辖"问题。此外,相关实体也应该不断增强自身应对"长臂管辖"问题的意识和能力。 In the context of globalization,with the deepening of economic,political,and judicial interconnection among countries,transnational civil and commercial cases and international criminal activities continue to increase.To facilitate litigation,countries are paying more and more attention to international judicial assistance and cooperation.At the same time,in order to realize their own hegemony,some countries often use international judicial assistance and international judicial cooperation to expand the field and scope of"long-arm jurisdiction",which would threaten the legitimate interests of other countries.At present,China still has many shortcomings in dealing with"long-arm jurisdiction".It needs to draw on relevant international legislative experience to formulate its own special blocking law,and by improving the extraterritorial jurisdiction system and promoting the construction of a new normative system to deal with the issue of"long-arm jurisdiction"in international judicial cooperation.In addition,relevant entities should continue to enhance their own awareness and ability to deal with the issue of"long-arm jurisdiction".
作者 岳树梅 黄秋红 YUE Shu-mei;HUANG Qiu-hong
出处 《北方法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期125-136,共12页 Northern Legal Science
基金 2019年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题“国际司法协助与合作中的‘长臂管辖’问题研究”(GJ2019B15) 2020年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“人类命运共同体理念下我国核安全治理体系和治理能力现代化研究”(20&ZD162)的阶段性成果。
关键词 国际司法协助 国际司法合作 长臂管辖 international judicial assistance judicial cooperation long-arm jurisdiction
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献83

  • 1靳茂.美国与西欧在苏联天然气管道问题上的矛盾和斗争激化[J].国际贸易,1982(9):33-34. 被引量:1
  • 2[美]霍夫鲍尔等:《反思经济制裁》(第三版),杜涛译,上海:上海人民出版社,2011年版,第1页.
  • 3Richard B. Cheney, "Defending Liberty in a Global Economy", in Solveig Singleton/Daniel T. Gris- wold, Economic Casualties:~ How U. S. Foreign Policy Undermines Trade, Growth and Liberty, Washing- ton: Cato Institute, 1999, p. 23.
  • 4A. Amir A1-Anhari, "The Impact of United Nations Sanctions on Economic Development, Human Rights and Civil Society", in Vera Gowlland-Debhas, United Nations Sanctions and International Law, Geneva:Kluwer Law International, 2001, p. 371.
  • 5John W. Boscariol, "An Anatomy of a Cuban Pyjama Crisis: Reconsidering Blocking Legislation in Response Extraterritorial Trade Measures of the United States", Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 30, 1999, p. 443.
  • 6"Societe Fruehauf-France v. Massardy", International Legal Material, Vol. 5, 1966, p. 476.
  • 7Amendment of Oil and Gas Controls to the USSR", Federal Register, Vol. 47, 1982.
  • 8Compagnie europ6enne des P6troles S. A. v. Sensor Nederland B. V. , District Court at the Hague, September 17, 1982, RabelsZ, 47 (1983), pp. 141-172.
  • 9European Community, "Note and Comments on the Amendments of 22 June 1982 to the Export Administration Act, Presented to the United States Department of State on 12 August 1982", International Legal Material, Vol. 21, 1982, p. 891.
  • 10European Community, "Note and Comments on the Amendments of 22 June 1982 to the Export Ad ministration Act, Presented to the United States Department of State on 12 August 1982", pp. 894-895.

共引文献237

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部