期刊文献+

WaveOne Gold、Reciproc Blue和M3-L在树脂模拟根管中的成形能力比较 被引量:9

Comparison of shaping ability of WaveOne Gold,Reciproc Blue and M3-L in simulated curved root canals
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过树脂模拟根管比较3种单支锉WaveOne Gold(WOG)、Reciproc Blue(RPB)和M3-L的成形能力。方法:将30个单弯树脂模拟根管随机分为3组,分别使用WOG、RPB、M3-L预备根管,数码相机采集预备前后根管图像,Adobe Photoshop 19.0软件图像重叠后,Image J 2.0.0软件测量预备后6个观测水平的内、外壁树脂去除量,根管工作长度、弯曲度及根尖偏移量。结果:WOG在距根尖2~4 mm内壁树脂去除量最少(P<0.05),外壁最多(P<0.05),RPB和M3-L在所有观测点的树脂去除量相近(P>0.05)。3组模拟根管的工作长度和弯曲度均减小,其中M3-L弯曲度改变最小(P=0.061),3种单支锉产生的根尖偏移均<0.1 mm(P=0.717)。结论:虽然3种单支锉均能较好的保持根管的原始形态,但WOG在距根尖2~3 mm明显向外壁偏移,M3-L预备后根管弯曲度改变最小。 Objective:To compare the shaping ability of WaveOne Gold,Reciproc Blue and M3-L in simulated root canals.Methods:Thirty resin blocks with simulated curved root canals were distributed into three groups,and prepared using WaveOne Gold,Reciproc Blue and M3-L.Standardized photographs of pre-and post-instrumentation were superimposed by Adobe Photoshop 19.0 software. Measurements were taken of the quantity of resin removed from the inner and outer walls of the curvature at 6 levels,working length,curvature angles and the transportation of the apical foramen.Results:After preparation,WaveOne Gold demonstrated significant differences(P<0.05)at 2~4 mm both inner and outer wall from the apical foramen.The working length and curvature of the three groups reduced,among which M3-L changed the least curvature(P=0.061).All the three produced apical transportation less than 0.01 mm(P=0.717).Conclusion:Although all the instruments can maintain the original root canal anatomy,WaveOne Gold produced obvious transportation at 2~3 mm outer wall,M3-L made the least change of curvature after preparation.
作者 晏瑾 彭彬 YAN Jin;PENG Bin(Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Enginering of Ministry of Education,School and Hospital of Stomatology,Wuhan University,Hubei Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2021年第2期71-74,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81970935)。
关键词 镍钛器械 弯曲根管 成形能力 Nickel-titanium instrument Curved root canal Shaping ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献65

  • 1Liu SB, Fan B, Cheung GS, et al. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile[J]. Am J Dent, 2006, 19(6):353-358.
  • 2Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, et al. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three enginedriven instrumentation techniques[J]. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(5):354-358.
  • 3Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(5):619-622.
  • 4De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, et al. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(12):1063-1068.
  • 5Park SK, Kim YJ, Shon WJ, et al. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy[J]. Scanning, 2013. doi:10.1002/sca.21096.
  • 6Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2):271-275.
  • 7Zhang C, Huang W, Sun Z, et al. A comparison of two guttapercha master points consisting of different phases in filling of artificial lateral canals and depressions in the apical region of root canals when using a warm vertical compaction technique[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(11):1041-1046.
  • 8Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations[J]. Int Endod J, 2008, 41(4):339-344.
  • 9Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2012, 37(4):220-227.
  • 10Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(11):1589-1593.

共引文献84

同被引文献34

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部