期刊文献+

不同处理对梨酵素抗氧化活性的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Different Treatments on the Antioxidant Activity of Pear Enzyme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本实验以新鲜的宁陵金顶谢花酥梨为原料,通过自然发酵、酵母菌发酵、乳酸菌发酵制作梨酵素,对比切丁处理和打浆处理对梨酵素发酵过程中理化指标和抗氧化活性的影响。结果表明,切丁处理后,酵母菌发酵优于自然发酵和乳酸菌发酵,梨酵素的还原力为2.40,多酚含量为35.57 mg·mL^(-1),羟自由基清除率为90.35%,DPPH自由基清除率为81.31%,ABTS自由基清除率为92.17%。打浆处理后,自然发酵比菌种发酵效果好,酵素液的还原力为2.36,多酚含量为34.81 mg·mL^(-1),羟自由基清除率为88.89%,DPPH自由基清除率为80.17%,ABTS自由基清除率为91.74%。 In this experiment,fresh Ningling Jindingxiehua pears were used as raw materials to produce pear enzymes through natural fermentation,yeast fermentation,and lactic acid bacteria fermentation.The effects of dicing treatment and beating treatment on the physical and chemical indexes and antioxidant activity of pear enzymes during fermentation were compared.influences.The results showed that after dicing treatment,yeast fermentation was better than natural fermentation and lactic acid bacteria fermentation.The reducing power of pear enzyme was 2.40,the polyphenol content was 35.57 mg·mL^(-1),the hydroxyl radical scavenging rate was 90.35%,and DPPH free radicals.The scavenging rate was 81.31%,and the ABTS free radical scavenging rate was 92.17%.After the beating treatment,the natural fermentation effect is better than that of the strain fermentation.The reducing power of the enzyme solution is 2.36,the polyphenol content is 34.81 mg·mL^(-1),the hydroxyl radical scavenging rate is 88.89%,and the DPPH free radical scavenging rate is 80.17%.The free radical scavenging rate of ABTS was 91.74%.
作者 吴慧 马双双 WU Hui;MA Shuangshuang(Shangqiu University,Shangqiu 476000,China)
机构地区 商丘学院
出处 《现代食品》 2021年第4期121-125,共5页 Modern Food
基金 河南省高校青年骨干教师资助项目(编号:2017GGJS197)。
关键词 梨酵素 抗氧化活性 处理方法 pear enzyme antioxidant activity treatment method
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1李升锋,刘学铭,陈智毅,徐玉娟,张友胜,吴继军.玫瑰茄花萼营养和药理作用研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2006,27(10):129-133. 被引量:32
  • 2柴之芳,祝汉民.微量元素营养概论[M].北京:原子能出版社,1994.
  • 3McClatchey W. From Polynesian healers to health food stores : changing perspectives of Morinda citrifolia (Ruhiaceae) [J].Integrative Cancer Therapies, 2002, 1: 110-120.
  • 4West B J, Tani H, Palu A K, et al. Safety tests and antinutrient analyses of noni (Morinda citrifolia L. ) leaf [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2007, 87:2583-2588.
  • 5Ahmad V U, Bano S. Isolation of b-sitosterol and ursolic acid from Morinda citrifolia Linn [J]. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan, 1980,2 : 71.
  • 6Saludes J P, Garson M J, Franzblau S G, et al. Antitubercular constituents from the hexane fraction of Morinda citrifolia Linn. (Rubiaceae) [J].Phytotherapy Research, 2002, 16:683-685.
  • 7Takashima J, Ikeda Y, Komiyama K, et al. A new constituents from the leaves of Morinda citrifolia [J]. Chemical and Pharnmeeutieul Bulletin, 2007,55:343-345.
  • 8Sang S, Cheng X, Zhu N, et al. Flavonol glycosides and novel iridoid glycoside from the leaves of Morinda citrifolia [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001a. 49:4478-4481.
  • 9Sang S, Cheng X, Zhu N, et al. Iridoid glycosides from the leaves of Morinda citrifolia [JJ. Join'hal of Natural Products, 2001b, 64:799-800.
  • 10Sang S, He K, Liu G, et al. A new unusual iridoid with inhibition of activator protein-1 (AP-1) from the leaves of Morinda citriJolia L. [J].Organic Letters, 2001c, 3 : 1307- 1309.

共引文献18

同被引文献25

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部