《庄子》与《紫文要领·物哀论》“情”观异同论

Similarities and Differences on Emotional Concepts in Chuang Tzu and Sibun Youryo·Mononoaware

《庄子》论“情”注重自然的“物情”、通天下的“气情”与合大道的“道情”,而本居宣长《紫文要领·物哀论》的“情”体现在“通人情”与“不通人情”。《紫文要领·物哀论》学习借鉴了《庄子》的“物情”观,二者皆注重自然、真实;《紫文要领·物哀论》汲取了《庄子》的“气情”,但不认可儒家的“仁”“义”“道”“德”规范;《紫文要领·物哀论》以“好色”为最高标的,不认同《庄子》“情”观中的大道及其天道之伦理。《庄子》的“情”观妙在目击道存,而《紫文要领·物哀论》陷于“情欲”之性,从二者的差异可辨识庄子的审美思想与本居宣长诗学理论的牵连与异趣。

There were three emotional concepts in Chuang Tzu:natural emotion,rational emotion,and carefree emotion.In Motoori Norinaga’s SibunYouryo·Mononoaware,emotions contained both human and inhuman feelings.Having learned the worldly feeling from Chuang Tzu,Motoori Norinaga in his SibunYouryo·Mononoaware emphasized on nature and reality;having drawn the passion from Chuang Tzu,Motoori Norinaga disagreed with the Confucian norms of“benevolence”,“righteousness”,“morality”and“virtue”;with“lust”as the highest target,Motoori Norinaga disagreed with the ethics of the natural law in Chuang Tzu.The emotional concept in Chuang Tzu was that when the eyes meet,there is no need to communicate with words,we could know each other’s purpose,while Motoori Norinaga was indulged in the erotic love.By studying the differences between the two books,the relevance and discrepancy of the aesthetic thoughts in Chuang Tzu and the poetic theory in SibunYouryo·Mononoaware could be differentiated.