期刊文献+

食管胃结合部腺癌122例Siewert分型及临床病理特征和预后分析 被引量:2

Siewert classification,clinicopathological features and prognosis of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction:a report of 122 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析食管胃结合部腺癌病人的Siewert分型及临床病理特征和预后,为食管胃结合部腺癌的临床干预提供参考依据。方法回顾性研究安徽济民肿瘤医院自2014年9月至2016年4月收治的122例食管胃结合部腺癌病人,将符合标准的食管胃结合部腺癌病人按Siewert分型分组,其中Ⅰ型15例、Ⅱ型32例、Ⅲ型75例;比较三组临床病理特征、治疗情况,绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析三组生存率;并分别采用单因素、多因素Cox分析食管胃结合部腺癌病人预后的影响因素。结果 Siewert Ⅱ型、Siewert Ⅲ型中体质量指数(BMI)>22.7 kg/m2比例为56.25%(18/32)、58.67%(44/75),显著高于SiewertⅠ型的20.00%(3/15);软组织浸润比例分别为18.75%(6/32)、24.00%(18/75),显著高于SiewertⅠ型的6.67%(1/15);Siewert Ⅲ型病人累积生存率为24.1%,显著低于Siewert Ⅰ型(75.0%)、Siewert Ⅱ型(59.5%)(P<0.05);单因素分析及多因素COX分析显示,肿瘤最大直径[HR(95%CI):0.551(0.307~0.990)]、肿瘤分化程度[HR(95%CI):2.152(1.057~5.841)]、肿瘤T分期[HR(95%CI):3.086(1.048~9.088)]、肿瘤TNM分期[HR(95%CI):1.069(0.577~1.983)]、淋巴结转移度[HR(95%CI):2.399(1.043~5.518)]、术后辅助化疗[HR(95%CI):4.354(1.294~14.647)]是食管胃结合部腺癌病人预后的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。结论不同Siewert分型的食管胃结合部腺癌病人临床病理也正存在一定差异,生存率可随分型的位置下移而下降,且预后与肿瘤最大直径、肿瘤分化程度、肿瘤分期、淋巴结转移度、术后辅助化疗密切相关,值得临床重视。 Objective To analyze the Siewert classification,clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction,so as to provide reference for clinical intervention of the disease.Methods A total of 122 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who were admitted to Anhui Jimin Cancer Hospital between September2014 and April 2016 were enrolled in the retrospective study.Patients who met the criteria were grouped according to Siewert classification,including 15 cases with type Ⅰ,32 cases with type Ⅱ and 75 cases with type Ⅲ.The clinicopathological features and treatment were compared among the three groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the survival rates of the three groups.Factors influencing the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction were screened by univariate analysis and multivariate Cox analysis.Results The proportions of body mass index(BMI) higher than 22.7 kg/m2 in patients with Siewert type Ⅱand type Ⅲ were 56.25%(18/32) and 58.67%(44/75),signiifcantly higher than 20.00%(3/15) in patients with Siewert type Ⅰ.The proportions of soft tissue infiltration in patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ were 18.75%(6/32) and 24.00%(18/75),significantly higher than 6.67%(1/15) in patients with Siewert type Ⅰ.The cumulative survival rate of patients with Siewert type Ⅲ was 24.1%,significantly lower than 75.0% of Siewert type Ⅰ and 59.5% of Siewert type Ⅱ(P<0.05).Univariate analysis and multivariate COX analysis results showed that the maximum tumor diameter [HR(95%CI):0.551(0.307-0.990)],tumor differentiation degree [HR(95%CI):2.152(1.057-5.841)],T stage [HR(95%CI):3.086(1.048-9.088)],TNM stage [HR(95%CI):1.069(0.577-1.983)],lymph node metastasis [HR(95%CI):2.399(1.043-5.518)] and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy [HR(95%CI):4.354(1.294-14.647)] were independent influencing factors of the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(P<0.05).Conclusions There are differences in clinicopathological features among patients with different Siewert types of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.The survival rate decreases with the type.The prognosis is closely related to the maximum tumor diameter,tumor differentiation degree,T stage,TNM stage,lymph node metastasis and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
作者 范伟超 刘爱国 FAN Weichao;LIU Aiguo(Department of Surgical Oncology,Anhui Jimin Cancer Hospital,Hefei,Anhui 230012,China)
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2021年第4期750-754,共5页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 食管肿瘤 Siewert分型 病理状态 体征和症状 肿瘤分期 存活率 危险因素 预后 Esophageal neoplasms Siewert classification Pathological conditions,signs and symptoms Neoplasm staging Survival rate Risk factor Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献37

  • 1赵东晖,徐惠绵,李凯,孙哲.Prognostic Factors for Patients after Curative Resection for Proximal Gastric Cancer[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences),2010,30(4):530-535. 被引量:3
  • 2ZHANG Xun,David I Watson,Glyn G Jamieson.Lymph node metastases of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(24):2268-2270. 被引量:7
  • 3Siewert J, HSlscher A, Becker K, et al. Cardia cancer: attempt at a therapeutically relevant classification [ J]. Chirurg, 1987,58 ( 1 ) : 25 -32.
  • 4Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005 [ J ].CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55 ( 1 ) : 10-30.
  • 5Piso P, Werner U, Lang H, et al. Proximal versus distal gastric car- cinoma-what are the differences? [J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2000, 7 (7) :520-525.
  • 6van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366 (22): 2074-2084. DOI: 10. 1056/NEJ- Moal 112088.
  • 7Stahl M,Walz MK, Stuschke M, et al. Phase IR comparison of pre- operative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in pa- tients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction [ J ] .J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 (6) : 851-856. DOI : 10.1200/ JC O. 2008.17.0506.
  • 8Tepper J, Krasna M J, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Phase 111 trial of trimo- dality therapy with eisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781 [ J ].J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26 ( 7 ) : 1086-1092. DOI: 10. 1200/JCO. 2007.12.9593.
  • 9Pedrazzani C, de Manzoni G, Marrelli D, et al. Lymph node in- volvement in advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma [ J] .J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2007,134(2) :378-385.
  • 10Mtinig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK, et al. Topographical distribution of lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophage- al junction [ J ]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2002,49 (44) : 419-422.

共引文献69

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部