摘要
人类命运共同体思想和西方全球正义观在价值追求层面存在相通之处,即构建全球化中的世界正义秩序,但二者在文化传统、理论基础、实践单位、实践方式和关切领域等方面差异显著。以个体参与全球治理为本位的西方全球正义观,存在损害国家主权、缺乏实践、与国家责任和民族自决相冲突等缺陷。人类命运共同体思想的以内为本、集体本位等特征,为西方全球正义观面临的困境提供了解决方法,对新型国际关系的构建提出了中国方案。
There are similarities in the value pursuit between the thought of the community of shared future for mankind and the western view of global justice,that is,the construction of a world order with justice in globalization. However,there are significant differences between the two theories in cultural tradition,theoretical basis,practical units,practice methods and areas of concern. The western view of global justice based on individual participation in global governance has defects such as lack of concrete practice,damage to national sovereignty,conflict with national responsibility and national self-determination. The characteristics of the community of shared future for mankind,such as inner-orientation and collective-orientation,have provided solutions to the dilemma facing the western view of global justice,contributing Chinese wisdom to the construction of the model of international relations.
作者
张安冬
刘琼莲
ZHANG Andong;LIU Qionglian
出处
《天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期22-26,共5页
Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金特别委托项目(2018MSJ002)
河南省社会主义学院2019—2020年度招标课题(HN20191204)。
关键词
人类命运共同体
新型国际关系
全球正义
全球治理
community of shared future for mankind
new model of international relations
global justice
global governance