摘要
目的研究血管紧张素转换酶抑制药(ACEI)/血管紧张素受体阻滞药(ARB)治疗对新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)合并高血压患者预后的影响。方法本研究为单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入武汉雷神山医院2020年2月17日至3月8日期间收住入院的新冠肺炎合并高血压患者共443例,随访至2020年4月1日。分为服用ACEI/ARB组共176例,未服用ACEI/ARB组(非ACEI/ARB组)共267例。分别比较两组入院临床特征,治疗用药,研究临床结局(院内死亡为主要观察指标)的影响因素。结果ACEI/ARB组院内死亡(RR=0.28,P=0.029),急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS,RR=0.21,P=0.023),脓毒症休克(RR=0.68,P=0.011)的发生率低于非ACEI/ARB组。Logistic回归分析表明,以是否发生院内死亡为因变量,入院后服用ACEI/ARB类药物(OR=0.208,95%CI0.057~0.759,P=0.017),服用他汀类药物(OR=0.043,95%CI 0.012~0.929,P=0.043)与高血压合并新冠肺炎患者院内死亡呈负相关,而年龄≥65岁(OR=2.932,95%CI 1.048~8.026,P=0.040)、慢性心力衰竭(OR=9.439,95%CI 1.118~79.686,P=0.039)与院内死亡呈正相关。以是否发生ARDS为因变量,logistic回归分析表明,入院后服用ACEI/ARB类药物(OR=0.147,95%CI 0.031~0.688,P=0.015)与高血压合并新冠肺炎患者院内发生ARDS呈负相关,年龄≥65岁(OR=3.523,95%CI 1.120~11.080,P=0.031)、合并糖尿病(OR=3.935,95%CI 1.306~11.856,P=0.015)与发生ARDS呈正相关。以是否发生脓毒症休克为因变量,logistic回归分析表明,入院后服用ACEI/ARB类药物(OR=0.273,95%CI 0.083~0.893,P=0.032),服用他汀类药物(OR=0.094,95%CI 0.010~0.838,P=0.034)与高血压合并新冠肺炎患者院内发生脓毒症休克呈负相关,合并冠心病(OR=3.348,95%CI 1.099~10.198,P=0.034)、合并慢性心力衰竭(OR=13.005,95%CI 1.838~92.036,P=0.010)与发生脓毒症休克呈正相关。结论对于新冠肺炎合并高血压患者,新冠肺炎病程期间服用ACEI/ARB类药物可能与院内死亡及ARDS、脓毒症休克的发生呈负相关,对新冠肺炎合并高血压患者的预后并无不利作用。
Objective To examine the relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers(ACEI/ARB)and the prognosis of patients suffering from cornavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)and hypertension.Methods A single-center,retrospective study was conducted in Wuhan,China.Patients with confirmed COVID-19 and hypertension admitted in Leishenshan Hospital from Feb 17 th,2020 to Mar 8 th,2020 were recruited in our study.The final date of follow up was April 1 st,2020.A total of 443 patients were included in the study,176 in ACEI/ARB group and 267 in non-ACEI/ARB group.Clinical characteristics and treatment in hospital were compared between two groups.Influence factors of clinical outcome(in-hospital death was main observation indicator)were studied.Results In ACEI/ARB group,the incidence rates of in-hospital mortality(RR=0.28,P=0.029),ARDS(RR=0.21,P=0.023)and septic shock(RR=0.68,P=0.011)were significantly lower,compared with those in non-ACEI/ARB group.Logistic regression analysis indicated that,in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB(OR=0.208,95%CI 0.057-0.759,P=0.017)and statins(OR=0.043,95%CI 0.012-0.929,P=0.043)were associated with lower in-hospital mortality,while age≥65 years(OR=2.932,95%CI 1.048-8.026,P=0.040)and chronic heart failure(OR=9.439,95%CI 1.118-79.686,P=0.039)were associated with higher in-hospital mortality.Logistic regression indicated that,in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB(OR=0.147,95%CI 0.031-0.688,P=0.015)was related to lower in-hospital mortality,while diabetes(OR=3.935,95%CI1.306-11.856,P=0.015)and older than 65 years(OR=3.523,95%CI 1.120-11.080,P=0.031)were related to higher incidence of ARDS.Logistic regression analysis indicated that in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB(OR=0.273,95%CI 0.083-0.893,P=0.032)and statins(OR=0.094,95%CI 0.010-0.838,P=0.034)were related with lower incidence of sepsis shock,while chronic heart failure(OR=13.005,95%CI 1.838-92.036,P=0.010)and coronary artery disease(OR=3.348,95%CI 1.099-10.198,P=0.034)were associated with higher incidence of sepsis shock.Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 and hypertension,in-hospital treatment of ACEI/ARB was related to lower in-hospital mortality and incidence of ARDS and sepsis shock.In-hospital treatment of ACEI/ARB had no adverse effect on prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension.
作者
徐梦丹
姚玉婷
吴莹
朱峰
徐浩
XU Meng-dan;YAO Yu-ting;WU Ying;ZHU Feng;XU Hao(General Practice Department,The First Affiliate Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200080,China;Department of Cardiology,The First Affiliate Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200080,China)
出处
《中华高血压杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第2期126-132,共7页
Chinese Journal of Hypertension
基金
松江区科学技术攻关项目(农业、医药卫生类,编号:19SJKJGG101)。