期刊文献+

质量监测视角下家园合作质量评价的国际比较研究 被引量:4

A International Comparative Study on Quality Evaluation of Home-Institution Cooperation from the Perspective of Quality Monitoring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在质量监测视角下,通过比较美国、英国、澳大利亚和新西兰四国在家园合作领域质量评价的标准,发现四国在家园合作领域的质量评价上具有以下特点:重视良好家园合作产生的效益,尊重家庭的多样性和独特性。借鉴四国标准,建议重视家园合作领域的质量评价,在评价中考虑家庭的多样性和独特性,探究适宜我国文化的家园关系。 By comparing the quality evaluation standards of U.S.A,England,Australia and New Zealand in home-institution cooperation from the perspective of quality monitoring,it is found that there are three characteristics of the quality evaluation in home-institution cooperation of these four countries:the benefits of home-institution cooperation are high-valued;the diversity and uniqueness of each family are respected.Learning from the experiences of these four countries,we should attach importance to the quality evaluation of home-institution cooperation,respect the diversity and uniqueness of each family,and explore the suitable relationship between family and institution in China.
作者 刘韵怡 吴颖倩 邵明铭 LIU Yunyi;WU Yingqian;SHAO Mingming(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《成都师范学院学报》 2021年第2期70-78,共9页 Journal of Chengdu Normal University
基金 北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心自主课题“质量监测视角下家园合作质量评价的国际比较研究”(BJZK-2019A3-19012)。
关键词 家园合作 质量评价 质量监测 国际比较 学前教育 home-institution cooperation quality evaluation quality monitoring international comparison early childhood education
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献37

  • 1刘丽湘.当前我国幼儿园教育质量评价工作的误区及调整策略[J].学前教育研究,2006(7):85-87. 被引量:50
  • 2刘赛力.保守党连续执政十七年来的英国经济[J].世界经济与政治,1997(1):65-68. 被引量:12
  • 3中华人民共和国教育部.幼儿园教育指导纲要(试行)[EB/OL].http://www.edu.cn/20011126/3011708.shtml2012-06-24.
  • 4Dahlberg, G.,Moss.P.,& Pence, A.R.Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives IMP. Psychology Press, 1999.45-53.
  • 5Vandell,D.,& Wolfe.B.Child Care Quality: Does it Matter and does it Need to be Improved? [J3. University of Wisconsin-Madi- son, Institute for Research on Poverty, 2000, (78): 79-84.
  • 6Halle, T, Viek, Whittaker.J.E., Anderson.R.Quality in Early C hild- hood Care and Education Settings:A Compendium of Measures [J3.Washington, DC: Child Trends.Prepared by Child Trends for the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Famihes, US Department of Health and Human Services,Accessed on Sept,2010, (4) :2012.
  • 7Epstein, A.S.Essentials of Active Learning in Preschool: Getting toKnow High/Scope Curriculum~ M 3.High / Scope Press, 2007.36 -98.
  • 8Tierney,R.D.Fairness as a Muhifaceted Quality in Classroom Assessment(J 3. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2014, (43) : 55 -69.
  • 9Shepard,L.,Kagan,S.L.,& Wurtz.E.Principles and Recommen- dations for Early Childhood Assessments [EB/OL3.http://files. eric.ed.gov/fulhext/ED416033.pdf.2016-1-10.
  • 10Pauline L Slot, Paul P.M. Leseman, Josje Verhagen, Hanna Mulder. Associations between Structural Quality Aspects and Process Quality in Dutch Early Childhood Education and Care Settings [J ]. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2015, (33): 64-76.

共引文献87

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部