摘要
现行化学需氧量测定仪A类仪器的检定方法存在诸多问题:检定时间较长,检定成本较高,现场检定时溶液标准物质不便于携带,检定废液对环境产生污染等。相较于溶液标准物质使用滤光片检定/校准A类化学需氧量测定仪能克服以上溶液标准物质带来的问题。本文通过对比阐述了两种方法的优缺点。
There are many problems in the verification method of class A Chemical Oxygen Demand meter:the verification time is long,the verification cost is high,the standard substance of the solution is not convenient to carry in the on-site verification,and the waste liquid may cause pollution to the environment.Compared with the solution standard substance,the filter verification/calibration of class A Chemical Oxygen Demand meter can overcome the problems caused by the solution standard substance.In this paper,the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are compared.
作者
丁萍
翟胜强
彭欣
王路
闫志国
DING Ping;ZHAI Shengqiang;Peng Xin;WANG Lu;YAN Zhiguo
出处
《计量与测试技术》
2021年第3期74-77,共4页
Metrology & Measurement Technique
关键词
分光光度法
化学需氧量测定仪
检定
滤光片
spectrophotometry
chemical oxygen demand meter
calibration
filter