期刊文献+

癌症病人需求评估量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:3

Chinese version of Needs Evaluation Questionnaire and its reliability and validity test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对癌症病人需求评估量表(Needs Evaluation Questionnaire,NEQ)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法:对英文版NEQ进行翻译和跨文化调试形成中文版NEQ,采用中文版NEQ对我院住院的300例癌症病人进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。结果:中文版NEQ的Cronbach's a系数为0.878,Guttman分半系数为0.899,重测信度系数为0.922。各条目得分间相关系数为0.501〜0.904,各条目得分与NEQ总分相关系数为0.487〜0.799(P<0.05)。量表平均内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.824,量表条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.800〜1.000。探索性因子分析共提取5个公因子,累计方差贡献率为55.60%。结论:中文版NEQ具有良好的信效度,可以作为我国癌症病人需求的评估工具。 Objective:To translate Needs Evaluation Questionnaire(NEQ)into the Chinese and test its reliability and validity.Methods:Chinese version of NEQ was formed by translation and cross-cultural semantic equivalence assessment.The reliability and validity of Chinese version of NEQ were tested by means of questionaire among 300 cancer in patients in our hospital.Results:The Cronbach's a coefficient of Chinese version of NEQ was 0.878.Guttman split half coefficient was 0.899.Test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.922.The correlation coefficients among scores of each item ranged from 0.501 to 0.904.And the correlation coefficients between the scores of each item and the total score ranged from 0.487 to 0.799(P<0.05).The Scale-Content Validity Index(S-CVI)was 0.824.And the Item-Content Validity Index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.800 to 1.000.The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that 5 common factors were extracted,whose cumulative variance contribution was 55.60%.Conclusion:The Chinese version of NEQ had good reliability and validity,which can be used as a tool for evaluating needs of cancer patients in China.
作者 顾艳霞 张磊 彭霞 GU Yanxia;ZHANG Lei;PENG Xia Jiangsu(Vocational College of Nursing,Jiangsu 223300 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2021年第7期1174-1177,共4页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 癌症 需求 信度 效度 量表研究 cancer need reliability validity scale research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

  • 1王丽霞,姜小鹰.脑卒中患者照顾者压力的研究与进展[J].上海护理,2005,5(3):54-56. 被引量:34
  • 2刘辉,王丽姿.重危患者家属需求量表中文修订版的探讨[J].护理学报,2006,13(4):84-86. 被引量:101
  • 3曹伟华,陈俊辉,陈晓君,李文苑,林端.晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者的相关信息需求分析[J].中华全科医师杂志,2006,5(11):672-674. 被引量:36
  • 4Cassileth B.Information and participation preferences amongcancer patients[J].Ann Intern Med,1980,92(6):832-836.
  • 5Fallowed L,Ford S,Lewis S.No news is not good news:infor-mation preferences of patients with cancer[J].Psycho-Oncolo-gy,1995,4(3):197-202.
  • 6Coulter A.Evidence based patient information[J].BMJ,1998,317(7153):225-226.
  • 7Meredith C,Symonds P,Webster L,et al.Information needs ofcancer patients in West Scotland:cross sectional survey of pa-tients,views[J].BMJ,1996,313(7059):724-726.
  • 8Mor V,Allen SM,Siegel K,et al.Determinants of need andunmet need among cancer patients residing at home[J].Health Serv Res,1992,27(3):337-360.
  • 9Houts P,Rusenas L,Simmonds M,et al.Information needs offamilies of cancer patients:a literature review and recommen-dations[J].Cancer Educ,1991,6(4):225-261.
  • 10Fallowfield LJ,Hall A,Maguire GP,et al.Psychological outcomesof different treatment policies in women with early breastcancer outside a clinical trial[J].BMJ,1990,301(6752):575-580.

共引文献202

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部