期刊文献+

认知负荷理论下的商务英语课程设计探析

An Analysis of the Curriculum Design for Business English Based on Cognitive Load Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知负荷是学习者的工作记忆所承载的压力,分为内在认知负荷、外在认知负荷和关联认知负荷。在宏观课程体系设计和微观课程设计两个层面,从学习内容选择、学习容量确定、学习顺序安排、学习手段改进和学习环境变革五个方面建构矩阵型研究框架,在总负荷不超载的情况下,通过降低外在认知负荷和提供关联认知负荷来提高商务英语学习效果,能够提升学习者的学业自信和学科自信,进而促进学科良性发展。 Cognitive load is the pressure imposed on learners’ working memory and can be divided into intrinsic, extrinsic and germane cognitive load. Based on the cognitive load theory, a matrix framework for the curriculum design has been established for undergraduate business English programs at the macro and micro levels. The matrix framework answers such questions as what to learn, how much to learn, in what order, what tools to use and in what context. By lightening the extrinsic cognitive load and providing the germane cognitive load to improve effectiveness in learning business English without overloading the learners’ working memory, the students’ self-confidence about their majors and studies can be enhanced, thus achieving good progress with the discipline of business English.
作者 王小娟 Wang Xiaojuan(Binhai College,Nankai University,Tianjin,300270)
出处 《长春教育学院学报》 2020年第12期41-47,共7页 Journal of Changchun Education Institute
关键词 商务英语 认知负荷 课程设计 business English cognitive load curriculum design
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献59

  • 1Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.P33.
  • 2Baddeley, A.(1992).Working memory.Science,255, 556-559.
  • 3Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection,search, and attention. Psychological R.eview,84(1),1-66.
  • 4Chi,M., Glaser, R.,& Kees, E.(1982).Expertise in problem solving. In R. Stemberg (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human inteUigence (pp.7-75.), Erlbaum, HiUsdale, NJ.
  • 5SweUer, J., Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review,10(3),251-296.
  • 6Sweller, J. & Chandler, P.(1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction,12,185-233.
  • 7Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology,88(1),49-63.
  • 8Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction,8(4),293-332.
  • 9P,.enld, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 15-22.
  • 10Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003) Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments, Educational Psychologist,38(1), 1-4.

共引文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部