期刊文献+

Cross-Entropy Loss for Recommending Efficient Fold-Over Technique 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 Due to the limited resources and budgets in many real-life projects, it is unaffordable to use full factorial experimental designs and thus fractional factorial(FF) designs are used instead. The aliasing of factorial effects is the price we pay for using FF designs and thus some significant effects cannot be estimated. Therefore, some additional observations(runs) are needed to break the linages among the factorial effects. Folding over the initial FF designs is one of the significant approaches for selecting the additional runs. This paper gives an in-depth look at fold-over techniques via the following four significant contributions. The first contribution is on discussing the adjusted switching levels foldover technique to overcome the limitation of the classical one. The second contribution is on presenting a comparison study among the widely used fold-over techniques to help experimenters to recommend a suitable fold-over technique for their experiments by answering the following two fundamental questions:Do these techniques dramatically lessen the confounding of the initial designs, and do the resulting combined designs(combining initial design with its fold-over) via these techniques have considerable difference from the optimality point of view considering the markedly different searching domains in each technique? The optimality criteria are the aberration, confounding, Hamming distance and uniformity. Many of these criteria are given in sequences(patterns) form, which are inconvenient and costly to represent and compare, especially when the designs have many factors. The third innovation is on developing a new criterion(dictionary cross-entropy loss) to simplify the existing criteria fromsequence to scalar. The new criterion leads to a more straightforward and easy comparison study. The final contribution is on establishing a general framework for the connections between initial designs and combined designs based on any fold-over technique.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science & Complexity》 SCIE EI CSCD 2021年第1期402-439,共38页 系统科学与复杂性学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College under Grant Nos.R201810,R201912 and R202010 the Zhuhai Premier Discipline Grant。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1Box G E P,Hunter W G,Hunter J S.Statistics for Experimenters.New York:Wiley,1978.
  • 2Chatterjee K,Fang K T,Qin H.Uniformity in factional designs with mixed levels.J Statist Plann Infer,2005,128:593 607.
  • 3Fang K T,Lin D K J,Qin H.A note on optimal foldover design.Statistics & Probability Letters,2003,62:245-250.
  • 4Fang K T,Lu X,Winker P.Lower bounds for centered and wrap-around L2-discrepancies and construction of uniform designs by threshold accepting.J Complexity,2003,19:692-711.
  • 5Fang K T,Ma C X,Mukerjee R.Uniformity in Fractional Factorials.Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing.Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
  • 6Fang K T,Mukerjee R.A connection between uniformity and aberration in regular fractions of two-level factorials.Biometrika,2000,87:193-198.
  • 7Fang K T,Tang Y,Yin J X.Lower bounds of various criteria in experimental designs.J Statist Plann Infer,2008,138:184-195.
  • 8Hickernell F J.A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound.Mathematics of Computation,1998,67:299-322.
  • 9Li H,Mee R W.Better foldover fractions for resolution Ⅲ 2^k-p designs.Technometrics,2002,44:278-283.
  • 10Li W,Lin D K J.Optimal foldover plans for two-level fractional factorial designs.Technometrics,2003,45:142-149.

共引文献41

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部