期刊文献+

聚合模式下网约车平台竞争策略研究 被引量:3

Research on competitive strategy of ride-hailing platform under aggregation mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在消费者对网约车平台关注存在差异以及对聚合模式存在偏好的情况下,建立双寡头价格博弈模型,分析差异化聚合平台的竞争均衡及影响因素。针对平台关注度差异对竞争的影响,引入聚合平台特许经营策略,进一步分析差异化平台竞争策略的适用范围。研究表明:聚合模式喜好者以及平台关注度增加会造成聚合平台恶性竞争,导致双方收益降低。在市场竞争中处于劣势地位的平台主动实施特许经营策略能够优化市场竞争,实现市场帕累托改进。 Considering the difference of consumers’attention to platform and their preferences for aggregation mode,this paper is using a duopoly price game model and analyzes the competitive equilibrium of differentiated aggregation platform and its influencing factors.Aiming at the influence of platform’s attention difference on competition,this paper introduces the franchise strategy of aggregation platform,and further analyzes the applicable scope of differentiated platform competition strategy.The results show that:the increase of the number of aggregation mode enthusiasts and platform attention will lead to vicious competition of aggregation platform,which will reduce the profits of both sides.In the market competition,the platform,which is in a disadvantageous position,can optimize the market competition and realize the Pareto improvement of the market by actively implementing the franchise strategy.
作者 李豪 肖青 陈炆炜 LI Hao;XIAO Qing;CHEN Wenwei(School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2021年第3期133-142,共10页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“共建共治共享背景下网约车市场治理的多方联动机制研究”(19XGL016) 重庆市社会科学规划项目“重庆城市居民出行方式选择与交通拥堵治理模式”(2017YBJJ033)。
关键词 聚合模式 网约车平台 HOTELLING 竞争策略 aggregation platform attention-degree Hotelling pricing strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1Rochet J, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets [ J ]. Journal of European Economic Association, 2003, 1: 990-1029.
  • 2Sujit Chakravorti, Roberto Roson. Platform competition in two-sided markets: The case of payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5 ( 1 ) : 118-143.
  • 3Manenti F M, Somma E. Plastic Clashes : Competition among Closed and Open System in the Credit Card Industry [ R ]. Working Paper, Berkeley: Berkeley Haas Business School at the University of California, 2002.
  • 4Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[ J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37: 668-691.
  • 5Ulrich K, Wright J. Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24 : 1-28.
  • 6Rochet J, Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors : The economics of payment card associations [ J ]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2002, 33(4): 549-570.
  • 7Wright J. Optimal card payment system[J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47: 587-612.
  • 8Schwartz M, Vincent D. Same price, cash or card: Vertical control by payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5(1) : 72 - 102.
  • 9Schmalensee R. Payment system and interchange fee [ J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2002, 2: 103-122.
  • 10Chang H H, Evan D. The competitive effects of the collective setting of interchange fees by payment card system[ J]. The Antitrust Bulletin Fall, 2000, 45: 641-677.

共引文献127

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部