期刊文献+

基于EQ-5D-5L量表的山东省农村地区胃癌患者健康效用值测量及影响因素分析 被引量:5

Health Utility Value and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Gastric Cancer in Rural Areas of Shandong Province Based on EQ-5D-5L Instrument
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:测量山东省农村地区胃癌患者的健康效用值,并分析其影响因素。方法:采用EQ-5D-5L测量山东省农村地区胃癌患者的生命质量,计算其效用值,并采用Tobit回归分析其影响因素。结果:样本地区胃癌患者的健康效用值平均值为0.86±0.21,EQ-VAS评分的平均值为74.74±16.98分。婚姻状况、居住地、疾病阶段以及有无其他慢性病对于患者健康效用值的影响具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:山东省农村地区胃癌患者的健康效用值较低,婚姻状况、疾病阶段、有无其他慢性病是胃癌患者健康效用值的主要影响因素。 Objective:To assess the health utility value of gastric cancer patients in rural areas of Shandong,and analyze its influencing factors.Methods:The EQ-5 D-5 L is used to assess the health-related quality of life of gastric cancer patients in rural areas of Shandong Province,and the utility value is calculated.Tobit regression is used to analyze the influencing factors of health utility value.Results:A total of 225 questionnaires are collected.The mean health utility value of gastric cancer patients is 0.86±0.21,and the mean EQ-VAS score is 74.74±16.98.Marital status,residence areas,pathological stageiand comorbidities have significant impact on health utility value(P<0.05).Conclusion:The health utility value of gastric cancer patients in rural areas of Shandong is lower.Marital status,pathological stage,and comorbidities are the main influencing factors of health utility.
作者 秦廷廷 刘思琦 苏明珠 孙晓杰 QIN Ting-ting;LIU Si-qi;SU Ming-zhu(Centre for Health Management and Policy Research,School of Public Health,Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan,250012,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2021年第3期43-45,共3页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 美国中华医学基金会资助项目(13-160)。
关键词 农村地区 胃癌患者 健康相关生命质量 健康效用值 EQ-5D-5L 山东 rural areas gastric cancer patients health-related quality of life health utility value EQ-5D-5L Shandong
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1官海静,刘国恩.中国四地城乡居民生命质量的比较分析[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(2):5-12. 被引量:60
  • 2周忠良,周志英,厉旦,王丹,施超,沈迟,方宇,高建民,陈钢.陕西省城乡居民健康相关生命质量研究:基于EQ-5D量表效用值的测算[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(2):13-16. 被引量:50
  • 3万崇华,孟琼,汤学良,张灿珍,罗家洪,张晓磐.癌症患者生命质量测定量表FACT-G中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2006,21(1):77-80. 被引量:416
  • 4Atsushi Tashiro,Masatoshi Sano,Koichi Kinameri,Kazutaka Fujita,Yutaka Takeuchi.Comparing mass screening techniques for gastric cancer in Japan[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(30):4873-4874. 被引量:24
  • 5A. Simon Pickard, PhD, Maria C. De Leon, BBA, Thomas Kohl- mann, PhD,David Celia, PhD,and Sarah Rosenbioom, PhD. Psy- chometric Comparison of the Standard EQ-SD to a 5 Level Ver- sion in Cancer Patients[J]. Medical Care,2007,45(3):259-263.
  • 6Seon Ha Kim, Hwa Jung Kimo Sang-il Lee, Min-Woo Jo. Compa- ring the psychometric properties o[ the EQ-SD-BL and EQ-SI)-BL in cancer patients in Korea[J]. Qual Life Res,2011, (9).
  • 7A. Simon Pickard, PhD, Thomas Kohlmann, PhD, Mathieu F. Janssen, MS, Gouke Bonsel, MD, PhD, Sarah Rosenbloom, PhD, and David Celia, PhD. Evaluating Equivalency Between Response Systems Application of the Rasch Model to a 3-Level and 5-Level EQ-5D[J]. Med Care,2007,45:812-819.
  • 8Nan Luo, Minghui Li,Gordon G. Liu, Andrew Lloyd, Frank de Charro,Michael Herdman. Developing the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-SD descriptive system: the response scaling ap- proach[J]. Qual Life Res,2012, (5).
  • 9Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, et al. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patientsin Korea[J]. Qual Life Res, 2012, 21(6): 1065-1073.
  • 10Kim SH, Hwang JS, Kim TW, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D for cancer patients in Korea[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2012, 20(12): 3155-3160.

共引文献2098

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部