期刊文献+

替考拉宁在感染的血液病患者中血药浓度的监测与应用价值分析 被引量:2

Monitoring and Application Value of Teicoplanin in Patients with Infectious Hematologic Diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨替考拉宁在感染的血液病患者中血药浓度的监测与应用价值。方法:回顾分析2017年12月-2019年12月来我院治疗的42例革兰氏阳性球菌引起感染的血液病患者临床资料,按照临床替考拉宁的给药剂量分A组和B组,每组21例。利用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)检测患者第5天用药前30 min的血药浓度,利用酶联免疫荧光法检测患者降钙素原(PCT)水平。比较两组血药浓度,临床疗效及PCT水平的差异,并记录不良反应。结果:B组患者血药浓度(15.12±4.68)mg/L高于A组的(11.76±5.31)mg/L,且B组患者PCT水平(0.86±1.21)ng/mL低于A组的(2.23±1.63)ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组患者临床有效率为95.24%(20/21),A组临床有效率为71.43%(15/21),两组临床有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组发生不良反应发生率为23.81%(5/21),B组不良反应发生率为19.05%(4/21),两组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。有效组患者血药浓度(17.21±6.64)mg/L高于无效组的(10.14±5.48)mg/L;且有效组患者PCT水平(0.65±1.31)ng/mL低于无效组的(2.63±1.87)ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对感染的血液病患者,提高替考拉宁初始负荷剂量可以达到较高的有效血药浓度,临床疗效更好,且不良反应未见增加。对感染的血液病患者进行血药浓度监测,能够一定程度上反映出临床治疗效果,具有临床参考价值。 Objective: To investigate the monitoring and application value of teicoplanin in patients with infectious hematologic diseases. Methods: The clinical data of 42 patients with hematologic diseases caused by gram positive cocci treated in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the clinical dosage of teicoplanin, the patients were divided into A group and B group, with 21 cases in each group. The plasma drug concentration was detected by high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) 30 minutes before the 5 day of administration, and the level of procalcitonin(PCT) was detected by enzyme-linked immunofluorescence. The plasma drug concentration,clinical efficacy and PCT level of the two groups were compared,and the adverse reactions were recorded. Results: The plasma drug concentration of group B was(15.12±4.68) mg/L, which was higher than that of group A(11.76±5.31) mg/L, and the PCT level of group B was(0.86±1.21) ng/mL, which was lower than that of group A(2.23±1.63) ng/mL, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The clinical effective rate of group B was 95.24%(20/21), and that of group A was 71.43%(15/21), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 23.81%(5/21) in group A and 19.05%(4/21) in group B,there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). The plasma drug concentration in the effective group was(17.21±6.64) mg/L, which was higher than that in the invalid group(10.14±5.48) mg/L;and the PCT level of the effective group was(0.65±1.31) ng/ml, which was lower than that of the invalid group(2.63±1.87) ng/mL, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: For the patients with infectious hematologic diseases, increasing the initial loading dose of teicoplanin can achieve a higher effective plasma drug concentration, better clinical efficacy, and no increase in adverse reactions. Monitoring plasma drug concentration in patients with infectious hematologic diseases can reflect the clinical treatment effect to a certain extent, which has clinical reference value.
作者 胡雪莹 李坦 昂韦 鲍扬漪 李斌 HU Xue-ying;LI Tan;ANG Wei;BAO Yang-yi;LI Bin(Department of Hematology Oncology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University/Hefei First People's Hospital,Hefei,Anhui,230000;Department of Pharmaceutical,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University/Hefei First People's Hospital,Hefei,Anhui,230000,China)
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2021年第1期188-192,共5页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 安徽省合肥市卫健委临床研究应用项目(合卫科教[2019]172号) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1508085MH195)。
关键词 替考拉宁 血液病 革兰氏阳性球菌 血药浓度 降钙素原 Teicoplanin Hematologic diseases Gram positive cocci Plasma drug concentration PCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献146

  • 1张永信.解读抗菌药物临床应用指导原则[J].上海医药,2005,26(2):62-63. 被引量:21
  • 2郭宾,李川.药物与血浆蛋白结合的药理学基础及其研究进展[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2005,10(3):241-253. 被引量:53
  • 3艾又生,徐楚鸿,陈志祥,陈华庭.高效液相色谱法测定替考拉宁的血药浓度[J].中国医院药学杂志,2005,25(3):254-256. 被引量:18
  • 4都丽萍,梅丹.药源性血小板减少症的发病机制和临床表现及防治[J].药物不良反应杂志,2007,9(6):414-419. 被引量:87
  • 5Uhart M,Leroy B,Michaud A,et al.Inter-individual and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability during teicoplanin therapy in geriatric patients[J].Med Mal Infect,2013,43(7):295-298.
  • 6Roberts JA,Pea F,Lipman J.The clinical relevance of plasma protein binding changes[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2013,52(1):1-8.
  • 7Brink AJ,Richards GA,Lautenbach EE,et al.Albumin concentration significantly impacts on free teicoplanin plasma concentrations in non-critically ill patients with chronic bone sepsis[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2015,45(6):647-651.
  • 8Hagihara M,Umemura T,Kimura M,et al.Exploration of optimal teicoplanin dosage based on pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of intensive care unit patients infected withwith methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J].J Infect Chemother,2012,18(1):10-16.
  • 9Roberts JA,Stove V,De Waele JJ,et al.Variability in protein binding of teicoplanin and achievement of therapeutic drug monitoring targets in critically ill patients:lessons from the DALIStudy[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2014,43(5):423-430.
  • 10Matthews PC,Chue AL,Wyllie D,et al.Increased teicoplanin doses are associated with improved serum levels but not drug toxicity[J].J Infect,2014,68(1):43-49.

共引文献218

同被引文献23

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部