中国神经梅毒研究中文文献计量学分析

Bibliometric analysis of the Chinese research literature related to neurosyphilis

目的了解国内神经梅毒的研究现状,为神经梅毒的研究提供新的方向和思路。方法运用Excel数据统计方法和文献计量学方法,以中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)及万方数据库为数据来源,采用高级检索方式,对1959-2019年神经梅毒相关中文文献进行定量分析。结果共纳入有效文献863篇;早期年发文量较少,21世纪初期逐渐增多并出现高峰,继而保持稳定增长趋势;广东、江苏、浙江、北京和福建为主要发文省份,发文量占总文献的54.81%(473篇);发文最多的机构是首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院和广州中山大学附属第一医院,发文量分别占总文献量的1.97%(17篇)和1.85%(16篇);《中国皮肤性病学杂志》《中华神经医学杂志》《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》和《临床神经病学杂志》是神经梅毒研究文献的主要载文期刊;研究内容以神经梅毒的临床特点分析最多,占总文献量的80.19%(692篇);署名基金资助的论文共96篇,占总文献量11.12%。结论我国神经梅毒研究正处于稳步发展期,主要研究内容为临床特点分析而相关基础研究较少,基金支持力度尚有待加强。

Objective To analyze the status of neurosyphilis research in China,and to provide recommendations and ideas for the research of neurosyphilis.Methods The related literature published from 1959 to 2019 were searched from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and Wanfang database.Excel 2016 and bibliometric method were used for quantitative analysis.Results There were a total of 863 valid literature.In the early years,the number of annual publication was limited.In the early 21 stcentury,the number grew to its peak gradually,and then maintained a stable growth trend.Guangdong,Jiangsu,Zhejiang,Beijing and Fujian were the main publishing provinces,accounting for54.81%(473 articles)of the total.The institutions that published the most were Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University,accounting for 3.82%(33 articles)of the total.Chinese journal of dermatology and venereology,Chinese journal of neuromedicine,Chinese journal of leprosy dermatology and journal of clinical neurology were the main ones for publication of neurosyphilis research.The clinical characteristics of neurosyphilis accounted for 80.19%(692 articles)of the total literature.A total of 96 papers were supported by different levels of funds,accounting for 11.12%of the total.Conclusion The research on neurosyphilis in China is in a period of steady development.The main research contents are the analysis of clinical characteristics,while the related basic research is few.The fund support is yet to be strengthened.