期刊文献+

The group size effect and synchronization of vigilance in the Tibetan wild ass

原文传递
导出
摘要 Vigilance behavior is considered as an effective strategy for prey species to detect predators.An individual benefits from living in a group by reducing the time spent being vigilant without affecting the probability of detecting a predator.However,the mechanism producing a decrease in vigilance with increasing group size is unclear.Many models of vigilance assume that group members scan independently of one another.Yet in recent studies,the other 2 patterns of vigilance,coordination and synchronization,were reported in some species.In 2 summers(2018 and 2019),we studied the group-size effect on vigilance and foraging of Tibetan wild ass in Chang Tang Nature Reserve of Tibet.We also tested whether individuals scan the environment independently,tend to coordinate their scans,or tend to synchronize their vigilance.The results showed that individuals decreased the time spent on vigilance with increasing group size,while increased the time spent foraging.Group members scanned the environment at the same time more frequently and there was a positive correlation between group members'behaviors,indicating that Tibetan wild asses tend to synchronize their vigilance.
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2021年第1期11-16,共6页 动物学报(英文版)
基金 This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(31772470,41871294) Tibet Major Science and Technology Project(XZ201901-GA-06).
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献44

  • 1Baker DJ, Stillman RA, Smart SL, Bullock JM, Norris KJ, 2011.Ajq the costs of routine vigilance avoided by granivorousforagers? Funct. Ecol. 25(3): 617-627.
  • 2Beauchamp Q 2001. Should vigilance always decrease with groupsie. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 47-52.
  • 3Berger 3,Swenson JE, Persson IL,2001. decolonizing carnivoresand naive prey: Conservation lessons from Pleistoceneextinctions. Science. 291: 1036-1039.
  • 4Bertram CR, 1978. Living in groups: predator and prey. In: KrebsJR,Davies NB ed. Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell,64-96.
  • 5Blunistein DT, 2006. The multipredator hypothesis and theevolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology112: 209-217.
  • 6Blunistein DT, Daniel JC, 2002. Isolation from mammalianpredators differentially affects two congeners. Behav. Ecol. 13:657-663.
  • 7Blunistein DT, Daniel JC, 2005. The loss of anti-predator beha-viior following isolation on islands. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272:1663-1668.
  • 8Blunistein DT, Daniel JC, McLean IG, 2001. Group size effects inquokkas. Aust. J. Zool. 49: 641-649.
  • 9Blunistein DT, Daniel JC, Springett BP, 2004. A test of themulti-predator hypothesis: Rapid loss of antipredator behaviorafter 130 years of isolation. Ethology. 110: 919-934.
  • 10Burger J, Gochfeld M, 1988. Effects of group size and sex onvigilance in ostriches Struthio camelus: Antipredator strategyor mate competition? Ostrich. 59: 14-20.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部