期刊文献+

质量管理实践对企业创新绩效的影响——市场竞争强度的调节作用 被引量:6

Research on the Impact of Quality Management Practice on Enterprise Innovation Performance——The Moderating Effect of Market Competition Intensity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 质量管理实践是促进还是阻碍企业创新绩效提升,学界至今仍存在较大分歧。区别于传统质量管理实践的界定,基于组织学习理论,既考虑组织内外部因素的影响,也考虑与创新相关的应用式与探索式学习类型,对质量管理实践重新进行划分,并将企业创新细分为产品创新与过程创新。在此基础上,构建质量管理实践与企业创新绩效关系的概念模型,引入市场竞争强度作为调节变量,提出相关假设,运用198个制造业企业有效数据进行实证检验。研究表明:质量管理实践对企业创新绩效具有显著正向作用;探索式质量管理实践相较于应用式质量管理实践,对企业创新绩效有更强的正向作用;市场竞争强度在4种质量管理实践与企业产品创新绩效和过程创新绩效的影响关系中具有不同调节效果。 Differed from the definition of traditional quality management practice,this study considers both the internal and external factors,and the division of exploitation and exploration learning related to innovation.This study reclassifies the quality management practice.Based on this,a conceptual model of the relationship between quality management practices and enterprise innovation performance was proposed,and market competition intensity was introduced as a moderator.Based on organizational learning theory,20 hypotheses are proposed and tested,using the valid data collected from 198 manufacturing firms in China.Research shows that quality management practice has significant and positive influence on enterprise innovation performance;exploratory quality management practice has a stronger effect than exploitative quality management practice;market competition intensity have different moderating effect on the relationship between quality management practice and enterprise innovation performance.
作者 孙卫 张凌祥 林子鹏 Sun Wei;Zhang Lingxiang;Lin Zipeng(School of Management, Xi′an Jiaotong University;Key Laboratory of Process Control and Efficiency Engineering in Ministry of Education, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710049, China)
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第7期95-104,共10页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(18XGL003)。
关键词 质量管理实践 创新绩效 市场竞争强度 Quality Management Practice Innovation Performance Market Competition Intensity
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献104

  • 1梁学成.转变服务业经济发展方式视域下的服务创新体系研究[J].中国软科学,2011(S1):76-83. 被引量:6
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3132
  • 3梁欣如,许庆瑞.TQM是否阻碍了全员创新?——TQM的管理控制模式与全员创新模式[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2006,6(2):48-53. 被引量:10
  • 4Barbara B Flynn,Roger G Schroeder,Sadao Sakakibara.The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage[J].Decision Sciences,1995,26 (5):659-682.
  • 5John C Anderson,Runtusanatham,Roger G Schroeder.A path analytic model of a theory of quality management underlying the Deming management Method:preliminary empirical findings[J].Decision Sciences,1995,26 (5):637-658.
  • 6Hale Kaynak.The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance[J].Journal of Operations Management,2003,(21):405-435.
  • 7Fred Fening,Gordana Pesakovic,Amaria.Relationship between quality management practices and the performance of small and medium size enterprises(SMES) in Ghana[J].International Journal of Quality& Reliability Management,2008,25 (7):694-708.
  • 8Thomas C Powell.Total quality management as competitive advantage[J].Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(1):15-38.
  • 9Douglas Dow,Danny Samson,Steve Ford.Exploding the myth:do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance?[J].Production and Operation Management,1999,8 (1):1-27.
  • 10Danny Samson,Mile Terziovski.The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance[J].Journal of Operations Management,1999,(17):393-409.

共引文献44

同被引文献131

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部