期刊文献+

首发抑郁症的患者静息态脑网络度中心度与认知功能研究 被引量:2

Study on the degree centrality of resting state brain network and cognitive function in patients with first episode depression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的基于体素的度中心度方法(DC)分析探讨首发抑郁症患者静息态脑网络节点中心地位的特点及其认知功能损害的神经影像学机制。方法纳入2013年5月至2019年3月武汉大学人民医院收治的首发抑郁症患者及同期招募健康对照各30例进行静息态磁共振扫描,并行数字符号测试、数字广度测试及语言流畅性测试。对静息态磁共振数据进行常规预处理,计算各组DC值图,采用双样本t检验分别比较两组DC值及认知功能测试评分,最后采用Pearson相关分析静息态脑网络DC值与认知功能测试评分的相关性。结果(1)与健康对照组比较,首发抑郁症患者在数字符号测试[(62.37±10.30)分比(70.47±10.12)分]、数字广度测试[顺背、倒背:(8.20±0.76)分比(9.27±1.12)分、(5.30±1.15)分比(5.73±1.56)分]及语言流畅性测试评分[(19.50±2.57)分比(22.57±4.45)分]明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。(2)与健康对照组比较,首发抑郁症患者左侧额上回DC值下降,右侧枕叶距状皮质、右侧扣带回中部、右侧纹状体DC值升高(P<0.01,AlphaSim校正,体素个数>55)。(3)相关分析结果显示,首发抑郁症患者右侧纹状体DC值与数字符号测试评分呈负相关(r=-0.48,P=0.01);左侧额上回DC值与数字广度测试及语义流畅性测试评分呈正相关(r=0.38,P=0.04;r=0.41,P=0.03)。结论首发抑郁症患者存在静息状态脑网络节点中心地位的改变,这些脑区主要位于右侧枕叶距状皮质、右侧扣带回中部、右侧纹状体及左侧额上回,其中右侧纹状体及左侧额上回脑网络节点中心地位的改变与患者认知功能损害密切相关,将为探索抑郁症认知功能损害的神经影像机制提供可能的神经影像依据。 Objective Based on the voxel-based degree centrality (DC) analysis, to investigate thecharacteristics of resting state brain network node centrality and the neuroimaging mechanism of cognitiveimpairment in patients with first-episode depression. Methods From May 2013 to March 2019, totally 30patients with first-episode depression in Renming Hospital of Wuhan University (MD group) and 30 healthycontrols (NC group) were included in the study. All subjects underwent resting-state fMRI. Then Digital SymbolTest (DST), Digital Span Test (DSPT), and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) were performed. The resting state fMRIdata were routinely preprocessed, and the DC map of each group was calculated. The DC value and cognitivefunction test score of the two groups were compared by double sample t-test. Pearson correlation was usedto analyze the correlation between the DC value and cognitive function test scores. Results (1)Comparedwith NC gorup, MD group showed decreased score in DST [(62.37±10.30) vs (70.47±10.12)], DSPT[forward: (8.20±0.76) vs (9.27±1.12);backward (5.30±1.15) vs (5.73±1.56)], and VFT [(19.50±2.57) vs(22.57±4.45)], and the differences were statistically significant (P< 0.01). (2) Compared with NC group, theDC value of the left superior frontal gyrus decreased, while the DC value of the right occipital calarine cortex,right middle cingulate cortex, right striatum increased in patients with first-episode depression (P<0.01, AlphaSimcorrection, voxel number > 55). (3) The Pearson correlation analysis showed that the DC value of the rightstriatum was negatively correlated with DST score of patients with first-episode depression (r=-0.48,P=0.01), while the DC value of the left superior frontal gyrus was positively correlated with the DSPT score and VFT score(r=0.38, P=0.04;r=0.41, P=0.03). Conclusions There are changes in centrality of brain network nodes inpatients with first episode of depression. These brain regions are mainly located in the right occipital cortex,the middle of right cingulate gyrus, the right striatum and the left superior frontal gyrus. The changes of thecentral position of the network nodes in the right striatum and the left superior frontal gyrus are closely relatedto the cognitive impairment of patients, which will provide a possible neuroimaging basis for exploring theneuroimaging mechanism of cognitive impairment in depression.
作者 陈诚 王惠玲 王高华 吴士豪 黄欢 荣蓓 Chen Cheng;Wang Huiling;Wang Gaohua;Wu Shihao;Huang Huan;Rong Bei(Department of Psychology,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China)
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2021年第1期10-14,F0003,共6页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
关键词 抑郁症 认知功能 静息态功能磁共振 脑网络 度中心度 Depression Cognitive function Resting state fMRI Brain network Degree centrality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1Medalia A, Lim R. Treatment of cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Pract, 2004, 10(1) : 17 -25.
  • 2Randolph C, Tiemey MC, Mohr E, et al. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status ( RBANS ) : preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsycho, 1998, 20(3) : 310 -319.
  • 3Gold JM, Queern C, Iannone VN, et al. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, Ⅰ : sensitivity, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiat, 1999, 156(12) : 1944 -1950.
  • 4Hobart MP, Goldberg R, Bartko J J, et al. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, Ⅱ: convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. Am J Psychiat, 1999, 156(12) : 1951 - 1957.
  • 5World Health Organization. World Health Organization - battery of cognitive assessment instrument for eldly. Geneva WHO, 1996:5 - 8.
  • 6Macleod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull, 1991, 109 (2) : 163 - 203.
  • 7Censits DM, Ragland JD, Gur RC, et al. Neuropsychological evidence supporting a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: a longitudinal study. Schizophr Res, 1997, 24(3) :289 -298.
  • 8Gold JM, Goldberg RW, McNary SW, et al. Cognitive correlates of job tenure among patients with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiat, 2002, 159(8) :1395 - 1402.
  • 9Ganguli R, Brar JS, Vemulapalli H, et al. Mini - mental state examination (MMSE) performance of partially remitted community - dwelling patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res, 1998, 33 ( 1 - 2) :45 -52.
  • 10Wilk CM, Gold JM, Humber K, et al. Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: normative data for the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Schizophr Res, 2004, 70 (2 - 3): 175-186.

共引文献98

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部