大科学时代科技合作者贡献之争--基于论文署名角色和贡献类型的案例分析

The Dispute of Cooperators’Contribution in Reward System of Science in the Era of Big Science--A Case Study Based on Authorship Roles and Author Contributions

当代科学奖励之争正在越来越多地由优先权之争转向合作者贡献之争,科研合作规模扩大、科技奖励有限名额、科技评价体系不完善之间的矛盾日益突出。文章通过案例研究,以科研论文署名信息和贡献类型为基础,结合科研人员的组织角色和获奖情况,比较了获奖者和未获奖者的群体特征及获奖者的顺位差异。研究显示,获奖者以“通讯作者”的署名角色和双重核心贡献类型为主要特征;获奖者的顺位则与其相互间的合作关系高度相关。文章由此进一步讨论了获奖者与未获奖者之间以及课题组之间的两种典型合作类型,分析了差序性共同合作与依附性分工合作对科技人员获奖的影响机制。

Nowadays,the debate on reward system of science is increasingly turning from the priority dispute to the dispute of cooperators’contribution.The contradiction across the expansion of science cooperation,the limited number of science awards and the imperfect evaluation system of science and technology is increasingly prominent.In this paper,based on the signature information and contribution types in scientific research papers,combined with the organizational roles and awards of researchers,the author compared the group characteristics of winners and non-winners and the differences in the rank of winners.The study shows that the main characteristics of the winners are the signature role of“corresponding author”and the contribution type of dual core layer task.The ranking of the winners is highly correlated with their relationships with each other.This paper further discusses two typical types of cooperation between winners and non-winners as well as between research groups,and analyzes the influence mechanism of different sequence co-cooperation and dependent division of cooperation on the science and technology awards.