摘要
While acknowledging the advantages of China’s unique model of abstract criminal law interpretation, there must exist its model defect, which requires the timely inclusion of criminal guiding cases. However,whether guiding cases can play a role in judicial practice and to what extent, and how to fit with the unique abstract criminal law interpretation model in China, it is necessary to make an in-depth analysis of the institutional attributes. Criminal guiding cases have the attributes of precedent and interpretation, and can consolidate the function of criminal law interpretation through the function of individual case interpretation. The reasonable expansion of the number of criminal guiding cases is the basic guarantee to give full play to the case interpretation function;the function separation of the criminal guiding case and criminal law interpretation is the system guarantee to maintain the independence of judicial application;the response of criminal guiding case to criminal policy is the concept guarantee to reflect its judicial justice;criminal guiding cases in China can be fully incorporated into the existing system of criminal law interpretation, as the expansion and supplement of the function of criminal law interpretation, so as to play the function of criminal law interpretation safely and effectively.
我国特有的抽象刑法解释模式在承认其优势的同时也存在模式缺陷,因此要求刑事指导性案例的适时纳入。但指导性案例在司法实践中能否发挥以及多大程度上发挥作用,如何与我国特有的抽象刑法解释模式相契合,就需要对其制度属性进行深入剖析。刑事指导性案例兼具判例属性与解释属性,可通过个案解释功能对刑法解释进行功能弥合。刑事指导性案例的数量合理扩充,是发挥个案解释功能的基础保证;刑事指导性案例与刑法解释的功能分立,是保持司法适用独立性的制度保证;刑事指导性案例对刑事政策的呼应,是体现司法公正的理念保证。我国刑事指导性案例完全可纳入现有的刑法解释体系,作为对刑法解释功能的扩充与补足,以安全有效地发挥刑法解释功能。
