期刊文献+

FibroTouch、FibroScan及ARFI在原发性胆汁性胆管炎相关肝纤维化中的诊断价值 被引量:10

Diagnostic value of FibroTouch,FibroScan,and acoustic radiation force impulse for liver fibrosis in patients with primary biliary cholangitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估FibroTouch与FibroScan、声辐射力脉冲成像(ARFI)对原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者肝纤维化程度的诊断效能。方法回顾性纳入2014年9月—2018年10月在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院行肝穿刺活检明确诊断为PBC的患者。采用METAVIR评分系统评估肝纤维化和炎症程度。在肝活检1周内分别应用瞬时弹性成像(FibroTouch和FibroScan)和ARFI技术检测肝脏硬度值(LS);以病理结果作为金标准,采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较3种超声弹性成像技术对PBC肝纤维化的诊断价值,并分析其影响因素;采用Youden指数计算不同程度肝纤维化的诊断界值。多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,进一步两两比较采用Bonferroni法校正P值。采用Spearman进行相关性分析,采用多重线性回归模型进行多因素分析。结果研究共纳入68例PBC患者,其中肝纤维化F0、F1、F2、F3和F4分别为13、15、18、12和10例。FibroTouch获得的LS(FT-LS)、FibroScan获得的LS(FS-LS)和ARFI获得的LS(ARFI-LS)与肝纤维化程度均呈强正相关(r值分别为0.798、0.782和0.742,P值均<0.001)。FT-LS诊断F≥2、F≥3、F=4 AUC分别为0.922、0.881、0.926,对应的cut-off值分别为10.5、15.8和17.5 kPa;FS-LS诊断F≥2、F≥3、F=4 AUC分别为0.918、0.878、0.939,对应的cut-off值分别为10.1、12.9和18.2 kPa;ARFI-LS诊断F≥2、F≥3、F=4 AUC分别为0.904、0.869、0.928,对应的cut-off值分别为1.45、1.83和2.08 m/s。3种超声成像技术对各期纤维化程度的诊断差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,FT-LS的影响因素有肝纤维化程度(β=0.399,P<0.001)、TBil水平(β=0.466,P<0.001)和PTA(β=-0.195,P=0.020);FS-LS的影响因素有肝纤维化程度(β=0.370,P<0.001)、AST(β=0.450,P<0.001)、PTA(β=-0.303,P=0.001)和ALP(β=-0.187,P=0.042);而ARFI-LS的影响因素有肝纤维化程度(β=0.489,P<0.001)、AST(β=0.467,P<0.001)和PLT(β=-0.188,P=0.028)。结论FibroTouch与FibroScan和ARFI在诊断PBC肝纤维化程度的效能相似,特别是对显著纤维化(F≥2)和肝硬化(F=4)具有较高的诊断效能,可作为诊断PBC患者肝纤维化程度的可靠手段。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of FibroTouch,FibroScan,and acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI)for liver fibrosis in patients with primary biliary cholangitis(PBC).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the patients who underwent liver biopsy and were then diagnosed with PBC in Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,from September 2014 to October 2018,and the METAVIR scoring system was used to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis and inflammation.Within 1 week after liver biopsy,FibroTouch,FibroScan,and ARFI were used to measure liver stiffness(LS);with pathological results as the gold standard,the area under the ROC curve(AUC)was used to compare the value of FibroTouch,FibroScan,and ARFI in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in PBC patients,and related influencing factors were analyzed;Youden index was used to calculate the cut-off values of LS for different degrees of liver fibrosis.The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison between multiple groups,and P value corrected by the Bonferroni method was used for further comparison between two groups.A Spearman correlation analysis was performed,and a multiple linear regression model was used for multivariate analysis.Results A total of 68 patients with PBC were enrolled in the study,among whom 13 had F0 liver fibrosis,15 had F1 liver fibrosis,18 had F2 liver fibrosis,12 had F3 liver fibrosis,and 10 had F4 liver fibrosis.LS obtained by FibroTouch(FT-LS),LS obtained by FibroScan(FS-LS),and LS obtained by ARFI(ARFI-LS)were strongly positively correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis(r=0.798,0.782,and 0.742,all P<0.001).FT-LS had AUCs of 0.922,0.881,and 0.926,respectively,in the diagnosis of F≥2,F≥3,and F=4 liver fibrosis,and the corresponding cut-off values were 10.5 kPa,15.8 kPa,and 17.5 kPa,respectively;FS-LS had AUCs of 0.918,0.878,and 0.939,respectively,in the diagnosis of F≥2,F≥3,and F=4 liver fibrosis,and the corresponding cut-off values were 10.1 kPa,12.9 kPa,and 18.2 kPa,respectively;ARFI-LS had AUCs of 0.904,0.869,and 0.928,respectively,in the diagnosis of F≥2,F≥3,and F=4 liver fibrosis,and the corresponding cut-off values were 1.45 m/s,1.83 m/s,and 2.08 m/s,respectively.There was no significant difference in diagnosing the same stage of liver fibrosis between FibroTouch,FibroScan,and ARFI(P>0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that degree of liver fibrosis(β=0.399,P<0.001),total bilirubin(β=0.466,P<0.001),and prothrombin time activity(β=-0.195,P=0.020)were influencing factors for FT-LS;degree of liver fibrosis(β=0.370,P<0.001),aspartate aminotransferase(β=0.450,P<0.001),prothrombin time activity(β=-0.303,P=0.001),and alkaline phosphatase(β=-0.187,P=0.042)were influencing factors for FS-LS;degree of liver fibrosis(β=0.489,P<0.001),aspartate aminotransferase(β=0.467,P<0.001),and platelet count(β=-0.188,P=0.028)were influencing factors for ARFI-LS.Conclusion FibroTouch has similar efficiency to FibroScan and ARFI in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in PBC patients,with relatively high diagnostic efficiency for significant liver fibrosis(F≥2)and liver cirrhosis(F=4),and therefore,it can be used as a reliable method for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in PBC patients.
作者 王民 罗文萍 张冠华 赵新颜 马红 田瑛 王宇 WANG Min;LUO Wenping;ZHANG Guanhua;ZHAO Xinyan;MA Hong;TIAN Ying;WANG Yu(Liver Research Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;Department of Geriatrics,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第4期817-822,共6页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
基金 北京市医院管理中心消化内科学科协同发展中心专项经费资助(XXT04) 北京友谊医院科研启动基金资助项目(yyqdkt2017-26) 中国肝炎防治基金会-王宝恩肝纤维化研究基金资助课题(WBE2020058)。
关键词 肝硬化 胆汁性 肝硬化 弹性成像技术 诊断 Liver Cirrhosis,Biliary Liver Cirrhosis Elasticity Imaging Techniques Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献101

  • 1Sebastian Mueller,Gunda Millonig,Lucie Sarovska,Stefanie Friedrich,Frank M Reimann,Maria Pritsch,Silke Eisele,Felix Stickel,Thomas Longerich,Peter Schirmacher,Helmut Karl Seitz.Increased liver stiffness in alcoholic liver disease:Differentiating fibrosis from steatohepatitis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(8):966-972. 被引量:10
  • 2Edouard Bardou-Jacquet,Ludivine Legros,Draman Soro,Marianne Latournerie,Anne Guillygomarc'h,Caroline Le Lan,Pierre Brissot,Dominique Guyader,Romain Moirand.Effect of alcohol consumption on liver stiffness measured by transient elastography[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(4):516-522. 被引量:20
  • 3Giovanna Ferraioli,Carmine Tinelli,Barbara Dal Bello,Mabel Zicchetti,Raffaella Lissandrin,Gaetano Filice,Carlo Filice,Elisabetta Above,Giorgio Barbarini,Enrico Brunetti,Willy Calderon,Marta Di Gregorio,Roberto Gulminetti,Paolo Lanzarini,Serena Ludovisi,Laura Maiocchi,Antonello Malfitano,Giuseppe Michelone,Lorenzo Minoli,Mario Mondelli,Stefano Novati,Savino FA Patruno,Alessandro Perretti,Gianluigi Poma,Paolo Sacchi,Domenico Zanaboni,Marco Zaramella.Performance of liver stiffness measurements by transient elastography in chronic hepatitis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(1):49-56. 被引量:18
  • 4袁利超,邵金华,郝美娜,李程,王贵萍,王泰龄,罗建文,白净,马安林.肝脏硬度测定仪FibroTouch与FibroScan和肝脏病理分期的相关性[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2014,22(6). 被引量:44
  • 5Ganne-Carrie N, Ziol M, de Ledinghen V, et al. Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatology, 2006, 43:373-374.
  • 6Mareellin P, Ziol M, Bedossa P, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int, 2009, 29:242-247.
  • 7Kettaneh A, Marcellin P, Douvin C, et ai. Features associated with success rate and performance of FibroSean measurements for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in HCV patients: a prospective study of 935 patients. J Hepatol, 2007,46:628-634.
  • 8Alisi A, Pinzani M, Nobili V, et al. Diagnostic power of fibroscan in predicting liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology, 2009,50 : 2(148-2049.
  • 9Han SH, Kim SU, Kim CO, et al. Abnormal liver stiffness assessed using transient elastography (Fibroscan (R)) in HIV- infected patients without HBV/HCV coinfection receiving combined antiret roviral treatment. PI.oS One, 2013,8 : e52720.
  • 10Corpechot C, El Naggar A, Poujol-Robert A, et al. Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and PSC. Hepatology, 2006, 43:1118-1124.

共引文献479

同被引文献129

引证文献10

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部