监察案件中法院对言词证据的审查判断

The Court's Review and Judgment of Verbal Evidence in Supervisory Cases

《监察法》以法律的形式确定了监察证据具有进入刑事诉讼的资格,但是该证据能否作为最后的定案证据还需要看它是否具备证据能力。现行《监察法》并未对证据的审查制定相关细则,在以审判为中心的改革背景下,完善法庭对监察证据的审查对查明案件事实有着至关重要的作用。言词证据是监察案件的主要证据形式之一,但在获取言词证据的过程中可能存在非法取证的可能,故而需要加强对言词证据的审查。应当在刑事诉讼中贯彻直接言词原则,完善非法证据排除规则,同时要建立调查人员出庭制度,重点审查被调查人口供的自愿性。

The Supervision Law confirms that the supervision evidence has the qualification to enter criminal proceedings in the form of law,but whether the evidence can be used as the final evidence depends on its evidentiary ability.However,the current Supervision Law does not formulate relevant rules for the review of evidence.In the context of trial-centered reforms,perfecting the court's review of supervision evidence plays a vital role in ascertaining the facts of the case.Verbal evidence is one of the main forms of evidence in supervisory cases,but there may be the possibility of illegal collection of evidence in the process of obtaining verbal evidence,so it is necessary to strengthen the review of verbal evidence.Therefore,the principle of direct verbalism should be implemented in criminal proceedings,and the rules for exclusion of illegal evidence should be improved.Meanwhile,a system for investigators to appear in court should be established to focus on the voluntariness of the confession of the people be investigated.