期刊文献+

考虑平台作用的顶张式立管动力分析 被引量:1

Dynamic Analysis of Top-Tensioned Riser on Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上层浮式平台的运动幅度比固定式平台大,对立管的影响更明显。为了解平台对顶张式立管动力的影响,提出一种动力分析方法。在一定的条件下建立立管的数学模型,采用软件Tube2D对平台和立管进行动力响应和弯曲应力分析,得到考虑平台作用的立管扶正器布置间距参数的敏感性和立管弯曲应力的变化。结果表明:对于考虑平台作用的立管模型而言,内套管与油管在立管上部更容易发生碰撞,从避碰的角度考虑,应适当减小立管上部扶正器的布置间距;各层立管的弯曲应力按弯曲刚度之比分配的结果与实际计算结果不符,应根据耦合立管模型的计算结果对各层立管进行强度校核。 The motion amplitude of a semi-submersible floating platform is large and has noticeable effects on the riser on the platform.The modeling and the dynamic analysis of the top-tensioned riser are studied.The dynamic response of the riser to the motion of the platform and the bending stress in the riser are researched.The relation between bending stress in the riser and centralizer spacing is studied.The sensitivity of the stress to centralizer spacing is analyzed.The research shows that the spaces between centralizers should be smaller at upper part of the riser to prevent the inner casing from striking the oil pipe because of platform motion.The model-calculated bending stress in individual pipe is different from that obtained by distributing the force on basis of bending stiffness of pipes.The latter is incorrect and should not be used.
作者 李艳丽 黄维平 常爽 柳振海 LI Yanli;HUANG Weiping;CHANG Shuang;LIU Zhenhai(Key Laboratory of Marine Technology Ministry of Communications,Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute,Shanghai 200135,China;State Key Laboratory of Navigation and Safety Technology,Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute,Shanghai 200135,China;School of Engineering,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China;Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute,Hangzhou 310012,China)
出处 《上海船舶运输科学研究所学报》 2021年第1期18-24,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute
基金 国家自然科学基金(51179179 51239008)。
关键词 顶张式立管 双套管 管间间隙 弯曲应力 top-tensioned riser double casing gap between tubes bending stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1毛国辉,王小松,郑鸿飞.车-桥耦合振动的联合方程分析方法[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(1):1-4. 被引量:5
  • 2周宏杰,闫澍旺,崔溦.Nonlinear Static Finite Element Stress Analysis of Pipe-in-Pipe Risers[J].China Ocean Engineering,2005,19(1):155-166. 被引量:9
  • 3Brennodden, H., sveggen, O., Wagner, D. A. and Murff, J. D., 1986. Full-scale pipe-Soil interaction tests, Proc. 8th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, OTC 5338. May 5~8, 433~440.
  • 4Det norske Veritas, 1981. Rules for submarine pipeline systems. Oslo.
  • 5Harrison, G. E., Kershenbaum, N. Y., Choi, H. S., 1997. Expansion analysis of subsea pipe-in-pipe flowline, Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, 293~298.
  • 6Hmadi, K.E. and O'Rourke, M. J., 1988. Soil springs for buried pipeline axial motion, J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 114(11): 1335~1339.
  • 7Kalliontzis, C., Andrianis, E., Spyropoulos, K. and Doikas, S., 1997. Nonlinear Static Stress Analysis of Submarine High Pressure Pipelines, Computers and Structures, 63(3): 397~411.
  • 8Rebis, Inc., 2000. AutoPIPE workbook. Canada.
  • 9Sriskandarajah, T., Anurudran, G., Ragupathy, P. and Wilkins, R., 1999. Design considerations in the use of pipe-in-pipe systems for Hp/Ht subsea pipelines, Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, 672~682.
  • 10Trautmann, C. H. and O′Rourke, T. D., 1985. Lateral force-displacement response of buried pipe, J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 111(9): 1077~1092.

共引文献15

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部