钱海岳《南明史·诸王传/表》补证续编

Supplement and Revision of Qian Haiyue's The History of the Nanming Dynasty:Kings'Biographies/Tables

钱海岳《南明史·诸王传/表》结合明史诸本、南明史籍,大体勾勒出明宗室在北京陷没后的行径,是研究明宗室活动不可或缺的辅助工具。但是由于资料的选取和信息的甄别是该著的特点,加上历史人物的记载容易受作者的主观判断而刻意被选择某一种“可能”,这就给以后的研究带来一系列障碍。因此有必要对该书进行考证以求信实。现根据相关史料和学界对明宗室的研究成果进行对校和提疑,挖掘出20例补漏之处和笔者的解释以供学界参考。

Mr.Qian Haiyue's The History of the Nanming Dynasty:Kings'Biographies/Tables combined with the history of the Ming dynasty or many historical books and documents of the southern Ming dynasty,which generally described the situation of Ming's imperial clan is the indispensable auxiliary tool to research the activities of Ming's imperial clan.However,due to the selection of data and the discrimination of information,the records of historical figures are easy to be subject to the author's subjective judgment,even deliberately to choose a"possible",which brings a series of obstacles to future research,so it is necessary to have a Textual research to excavate the real.According to relevant historical data and academic research results of the imperial clan of Ming dynasty,this paper raises the doubts,excavates 20 cases of leakage and gives the author's explanation for academic reference.