中国地方行政审批改革模式选择——基于地区差异的公共服务均等化与同质化

Reform Mode Choices of Local Administrative Examination and Approval in China:Equalization and Homogenization of Public Services Based on Regional Variations

目前本轮行政审批改革在实践中存在两种模式——集中审批模式与精益治理模式,二者的区别显见表现为是否设置权责集中的行政审批局。通过对典型案例的实际调查研究与实证比较,得出两种模式在改革逻辑、历程、工具、成本、效果以及问题难点方面的具体异同,从初始条件、两种发展取向团队的定义、激励机制、谈判能力分析两种模式路径选择的内在机制,指出制度路径和技术路径“殊途同归”的改革未来。进而,通过认识本轮行政审批改革在各地试错推进的现象和本质,讨论了不同路径选择一定程度上解决了这样一个核心问题:在地域差异巨大的中国实现地方公共服务均等化与同质化。

At present,there are two modes of the current round of reform of administrative examination and approval in practice:the centralized examination&approval mode and the lean governance mode.The difference between the two is obviously manifested in whether to set the AEA bureau with centralized power and responsibility.Through the typical case of actual investigation and study and the empirical comparison,it is concluded that similarities and differences between two modes in the reform logic,process,tools,cost,effect,and problems.From the initial conditions,two kinds of the definition of team development orientation,incentive mechanism and negotiation ability to analyze the internal mechanism of route choice.Then,points out that the system path and the technical path of“all roads lead to Rome”reform in the future.Furthermore,by understanding the phenomenon and nature of the trial-and-error promotion of this round of reform of administrative examination and approval in various places,this paper discusses the different path choices to some extent to solve such a core problem:to achieve the equalization and homogenization of local public services in China with huge regional differences.