摘要
司法实践中将交通肇事罪司法解释中的“事故责任”与《道交法》中的“事故责任”相混淆,这会导致不公平的裁判结果。司法解释中的事故责任属于交通肇事罪的构成要件之一,反映了该罪客观要件要素即危害行为的法益侵害程度。在认定“事故责任”时需要进行定性分析,以行为人的违章行为对事故发生所起的作用为标准,将其认定为事故主要责任、次要责任以及事故同等责任。
To confuse the traffic accident liability in the judicial interpretation concerning crime of traffic offense with that in The Law on Road Traffic Safety will lead to unfair convictions.The traffic accident liability in the judicial interpretation is one of the objective elements of the crime of traffic offense and it shows the degree of the infringement of legal interests by the dangerous act.The traffic accident liability must be properly defined as the major liability,the secondary liability and the equal liability,based on the role of the violation of regulations in the accident.
作者
刘蓝璟
LIU Lan-jing(Department of Management,Software Engineering Institute of Guangzhou,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510000,China)
出处
《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第1期64-67,73,共5页
Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
关键词
司法解释
交通肇事罪
事故责任
性质
认定
judicial interpretation
crime of traffic offense
traffic accident liability
nature
definition