期刊文献+

铁路站台单柱雨棚结构抗连续倒塌性能分析 被引量:2

Progressive collapse capacity analysis of platform canopies with single-column
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用非线性动力拆除构件法,对铁路站台有柱雨棚"Y"形钢筋混凝土典型单元进行了抗连续倒塌性能分析,研究了结构的连续倒塌抗力机制和失效模式;并对不同柱距、不同抗震设防烈度及不同楼板的雨棚结构进行了分析和对比。局部构件失效后,剩余结构抗倒塌机制主要为梁机制和悬链线机制;在边柱失效后,剩余结构承载机制仅有梁机制,结构抗连续倒塌性能较弱;在中柱和内柱失效的情况下,剩余结构具备梁机制和悬链线机制提供的抗倒塌承载力,结构抗连续倒塌性能较强;柱距增加,雨棚结构抗连续倒塌性能减弱;抗震设计对于结构梁机制相对承载力的提升较大,对悬链机制相对承载力的提升取决于梁内通长钢筋的增幅;整体现浇楼板对雨棚结构抗连续倒塌性能的增强效果显著,梁机制和悬链线机制的相对承载力均有较大提高。 In order to investigate the resistance mechanism and failure model of a typical column "Y"shaped reinforced concrete canopy structure,nonlinear dynamic analyses from the alternative path method are carried out in three cases. Six model canopy structures are designed and numerically analyzed to evaluate the effects of distance between columns,seismic fortification level and slab type. Research conclusions: The results show that the residual structure has two main resistance mechanism which are the beam action and the catenary action. In the case of side column removal,only the beam action works and the capacity of residual structure is extremely low. In the other two cases,both the beam action and the catenary action can work and the residual structures play a better performance on the progressive collapse capacity. The progressive collapse capacity can be improved by decreasing the distance between columns. The progressive collapse capacity of canopy structure under the beam action is significantly enhanced by higher seismic fortification level,however for the capacity under the catenary action,the enhancement extent relates to the incremental quantity of steel along the axis of beam. The progressive collapse performance of canopy structure can be improved vastly by integrated cast-in-situ slab while the capacities of the beam action and the catenary action can both be enhanced.
作者 房胜兵 陈前 杨佑发 Fang Sheng-bing;Chen Qian;Yang You-fa(China Railway First Survey&Design Institute Group Co.Ltd,Xi'an 710043,China;College of Civil Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China)
出处 《工程抗震与加固改造》 北大核心 2021年第1期159-166,共8页 Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting
基金 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司科技研发课题(编号:17-44)。
关键词 铁路站台有柱雨棚 “Y”形结构 连续倒塌 拆除构件法 platform canopy structure "Y"shaped structure progressive collapse alternate path method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

  • 1杨溥,李东,李英民,赖明.抗震结构静力弹塑性分析(Push-over)方法的研究进展[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2000,22(z1):87-92. 被引量:25
  • 2李易,陆新征,叶列平,陈适才.基于Pushdown分析的RC框架抗连续倒塌承载力研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2011,27(1):10-18. 被引量:40
  • 3白绍良,李刚强,李英民,韦锋.从R-μ-T关系研究成果看我国钢筋混凝土结构的抗震措施[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(5):144-151. 被引量:24
  • 4GB50010-2010,混凝土结构设计规范[s].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.2010.
  • 5GSA2003 Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization project [ S ]. Washington DC : United States General Services Administration, 2003.
  • 6DoD2010 Design of structures to resist progressive collapse[ S]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2010.
  • 7Powell G. Progressive collapse case studies using nonlinear analysis [ C -//Metropolis & Beyond: Proceeding of ASCE/SEI Structures Conference. New York: ASCE/SEI, 2005.
  • 8Marjanishvili S M, Agnew E. Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis [ J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2006, 20(4) : 365-374.
  • 9Ruth P, Marchand S M, equivalency in progressive Williamson E B. Static collapse alternate path analysis : reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2006, 20 (4): 349- 364.
  • 10Dusenberry D O, Hamburger R O. Practical means for energy-based analyses of disproportionate collapse potential [ J ]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2006, 20(4): 336-348.

共引文献228

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部