期刊文献+

美国本科学生学习成果评估标准的框架、特征与启示——美国大学联合会“VALUE标准”解析 被引量:1

The Framework,Characteristics and Implications of American Undergraduate Student Learning Outcome Assessment Criteria:Analysis of the “VALUE Rubrics” of the Association of American Colleges & Universities(AAC&M)
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国大学联合会组织开发的VALUE标准为帮助高校展示、分享和评估本科学生在综合性学习方面的成就和学业增值提供了行之有效的评估方法和准则。标准经历了制定开发、修订完善、重要发展、反思回顾阶段,其开发设计秉承着循证理念,具有逻辑简明、范畴清晰的框架结构,包含知识和实践技能、个人与社会责任、综合及应用学习三个维度的内容体系,并且具有关键标准和丰富内涵的指标构成,建立了锚定学生最优表现的评定等级。VALUE标准在实施过程中增强了美国本科学生学习成果评估的证据性,给高校及师生带来重要影响与变化,但在具体应用过程中尚存有局限,仍需不断完善。对VALUE标准的深度解析可以为我国一流本科教育质量评估标准建设及实施提供有益启示。 The"VALUE Rubrics of Learning in Undergraduate Education"developed by the AAC&U provides effective evaluation methods and criterion to help universities display,share and evaluate the achievements of undergraduate students in comprehensive learning and academic appreciation. The VALUE Rubrics has experienced the stages of formulation,development,revision and improvement,important development,reflection and review. Its development and design adhere to the evidence-based concept,has a logical and clear framework structure,including knowledge and practical skills,personal and social responsibility,comprehensive and applied learning. It establishes a rich set of indicators with key criteria and implications and a rating hierarchy that anchors optimal student performance. In the process of implementation,the VALUE standard has enhanced the evidential nature of the evaluation of American undergraduate students’ learning results and brought important influences and changes to universities,teachers and students. However,there are still limitations in the specific application process and it still needs to be improved continuously. The in-depth analysis of the VALUE standard can provide beneficial enlightenment for the construction and implementation of the quality assessment standard of first-rate undergraduate education in China.
作者 苏成宇 李晓虹 SU Chengyu;LI Xiaohong
出处 《煤炭高等教育》 2020年第6期45-55,共11页 Meitan Higher Education
基金 辽宁省教育厅科学研究基础项目“我国‘双一流’建设评价标准的效能价值取向研究”(WJC202011)。
关键词 VALUE标准 学习成果评估 本科学生 美国大学联合会 VALUE rubrics student learning outcomes assessment college students Association of American Colleges&Universities
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1盛群力.依据学习结果选择教学策略——乔纳森的学习结果与教学策略适配观要义[J].远程教育杂志,2005,23(5):12-17. 被引量:11
  • 2Rich-Ard Hofstadter, Wilson Smith (Ed.). American Higher Education:A Documentary History [C]. Chicago:The University Of Chicago Press, 1968. 10.
  • 3Arthur M. Cohen. The Shaping Of American Higher Education:Emergence And Growth Of The Contemporary System [ M ]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1998. 147.
  • 4Pat Hutchings ,Ted Marchese. Watching Assessment: Questions, Stories,Prospects [J]. Change, 1990,22(5) : 13-38.
  • 5Howard J Savage. Fruit Of An Impulse:Forty-Five Years Of The Carnegie Foundation, 1905-1950 [ M ]. New York: Harcourt, Brace, And Company, 1953. 284,288.
  • 6William Setchel Learned,Ben D. Wood. The Student And His Knowledge:A Report To The Carnegie Foundation On The Results Of The High School And College Examination Of 1928,1930,And 1932[R]. Boston :The Merrymount Press, 1938. 29-372.
  • 7R Frodin. Very Simple But Thoroughgoing[A]. The College Of The University Of Chicago And F. Champion Ward (Ed.). The Idea And Practice Of General Education:An Account Of The College Of The University Of Chicago [ C ]. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press, 1950. 25-99.
  • 8Richard J. Shavelson. A Brief History Of Student Learning Assessment:How We Got Where We Are And A Proposal For Where To Go Next [Z]. Washington D.C.:The Association Of American Colleges And Universities, 2007. 8,8,11,15-18.
  • 9Serbrenia J. Sims. Student Outcomes Assessment:A Historical Review And Guide To Program Development [ M ]. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1992. 31,37-38,39.
  • 10Richard J. Shavelson. Measuring College Learning Responsibly:Accountability in a New Era [ M ]. California: Stanford University, 2010. 28-29,30.

共引文献45

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部